Is Ward going to LHW because of Degale?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bailey, Oct 17, 2015.


  1. sniffmybadger

    sniffmybadger Relationships are not my forte Full Member

    9,528
    9,440
    Jan 20, 2010
    But Kov is a LHW :blood

    That's like getting out of a cage with a furious weasel and stepping into one with a psychotic lion
     
  2. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    He was proven to have beaten big name but aged fighters and he was more proven at losing also.
    Just look at how Dawson looked to Bute against common opponent G Johnson, look at how Bute had never lost at that time and Dawson had.
    Look at how Dawson has lost now to Karpency, but hey hes more proven than Degale so must be the better tougher fight :patsch. ridiculous Loudon.
    What you cant dispute and never will be able to dispute is that Bute was more proven at SMW than Dawson, was more proven to make the weight than Dawson, was looking more destructive than Dawson, had not lost like Dawson. I could go on but you just dont see your own double standards whilst accusing others.
    Throw in also that Ward/Bute would have been a bigger fight all round and a big unification but that wont suit your double standards I expect
     
  3. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    will come back the rest later.
    Serge, great posting
     
  4. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,861
    10,273
    Mar 7, 2012
    :good
     
  5. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,861
    10,273
    Mar 7, 2012
    Serge,

    In the interview that I read, he basically said he wanted to see how he felt after weighing in at 172 pounds, and that he and Virgil would assess his performance before making a decision on where he went afterwards.

    To be honest, I had no issue with him fighting Paul Smith at all at that point.

    Maybe he didn't feel rusty in his preparation for Rodriguez. I don't know. But that was two years ago. He's older now, and going into the fight against Smith, he hadn't fought for 19 months. That's a long time for a fighter to be out in his 30's. I don't care how great someone is, it simply has to take it's toll on them, both mentally and physically.

    Did you hear that he's reportedly signed a three fight deal with HBO?

    He needs to get back in the ring ASAP, he's wasting his prime years. I honestly don't even care who he fights on the Canelo-Cotto card, I just want him back in the ring.

    :good
     
  6. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,861
    10,273
    Mar 7, 2012
    I knew you wouldn't pick on me twice in the same week.

    :rofl
     
  7. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,861
    10,273
    Mar 7, 2012
    Serge,

    :rofl
     
  8. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,861
    10,273
    Mar 7, 2012
    It's all very silly. But these guys have huge egos.
     
  9. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,861
    10,273
    Mar 7, 2012
    bailey,

    Yes, Dawson had lost before fighting Ward, and yes, his best wins were against aged fighters. But I stand by my point. He was still more proven than Bute and DeGale, and he had a better resume.

    I'm a huge fan of DeGale's, but he officially lost to Groves (I had it as a draw) and his biggest win was against Dirrell in a very close fight.

    Why is age such a factor for you here? You give Joe huge credit for beating a 43 year old Hopkins. And that's because Hopkins was still a top level fighter at the time. And the same applied to Hopkins and Tarver when Dawson beat them. Despite their age, they were still good wins.

    You've mentioned that one of Bute's best wins was against Brian Magee. Yet he turned 36 just after their fight.

    You mention the likes of Bika being one of Bute's best wins. Yet Bika hasn't had a noteworthy win in his entire career.

    What's Tommy Karpency got to do with anything? We are looking from the perspective of 2012 when Ward fought Dawson. Again, when Ward fought Dawson, he was more proven and had a better resume than what DeGale has now.

    Again, I've never specifically mentioned SMW.

    Double standards? The only double standards are that you criticised me for butting into your debate with Man Machine, before then doing the exact same thing yourself when I was debating with Beatle.

    Of course a Bute-Ward fight would have been huge. It's a real shame that we never saw it. But in my honest opinion, I think we'd have seen it at some point had Carl not destroyed Bute. We've discussed this before. Now if you don't agree with that, that's fair enough. But I'll never believe that Ward was scared of fighting him. I believe that after the final of the Super Six, he was more than happy to have a break and to let his hand heal. He was content to sit back and let Carl step in and fight him. But if Bute had've beaten the runner up of the Super Six, there would have been a huge demand for a Ward-Bute fight. And again, I think we'd have seen it. I think the reason he fought Dawson was because he wanted a big fight after losing out on the Bute fight. After Carl had destroyed him, nobody was interested in a Ward-Bute fight. Again, you're entitled to your opinion, but in my opinion, a fighter who was scared of Bute, would never have gone on to fight Dawson. That would have been illogical.

    :good
     
  10. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    I have been very frustrated with Ward lately. I really hope he fights Kovalev, but I am not sure I can see it happening.
     
  11. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,861
    10,273
    Mar 7, 2012
    According to reports, he's signed a three fight deal with HBO, that includes a Kovalev fight.

    We'll have to see.
     
  12. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Who ever started this thread was either high or drunk. Or from the UK.
     
  13. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    1. DeGale lost to Groves. Don't like the triangle theory since it's wrong far more often than it's right, but many believe Groves WAS the better overall fighter.

    2. Even getting dropped a couple times, Andre Dirrel beat DeGale. He got robbed again, but like the Scott v Glaskov fight, we all know who won.

    3. Ward would trounce DeGale. That is if he can still make SMW.:think
     
  14. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    I seem to recall reading years ago that Hatton signed a deal that included a fight with Jnr Witter and I didnt see that happen.

    As for Ward facing Kovalev. I dont think it will happen too soon unless Kovalev is in a series of draining battles, or gets exposed badly even in victory or suffers a loss in some way.
    I dont think Ward will face Kovalev until after he (Kovalev) has cleaned out some of the other top LHWs in tough fights.
    I dont think Ward would face Kovalev until after he has faced Beterbiev.
    I would imagine if Kovalev was to lose in some way to a fighter he was not expected to lose to, who is not as skilled, but upsets happen sort of thing, I think ward then may go after that winning fighter and forget Kovalev in that scenario.
    Still all of that is only a feeling and opinion and no more than that.

    I recall when Baldomir pulled an upset and beat Judah, there was interest from Hatton to face Baldomir, saying to beat the man who beat the man, yet there wasnt the same interest to face Judah.
    I think people should have given Floyd Mayweather massive credit for facing Judah after Baldomir, as he could have beaten Baldomir and ignored Judah, but Judah was I believe that tougher battle and Floyd went and defended against Judah. Massive respect
     
  15. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    Why is that then?
    Looks like the sort of comment someone would make out of insecurity. Then I saw the name of the poster who made the comment and no further comment was needed :lol::oops::patsch