Why is Wlad Klitschko Considered an ATG

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mr.DagoWop, Oct 23, 2015.


  1. wylan911

    wylan911 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,775
    53
    Sep 27, 2013
    Based off of this argument, and considering you have Tyson as an ATG, then that makes James "Buster" Douglas an ATG. considering he sparked Tyson.
     
  2. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,905
    2,165
    Feb 8, 2008
    dont forget danny williams and Kevin mcbride :lol:
     
  3. wylan911

    wylan911 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,775
    53
    Sep 27, 2013
    Good point! :good
     
  4. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
  5. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Sorry, Wladmirs opposition isn't greater than Tysons.

    He has dominance yes, but he also doesn't share his era with Evander Holyfield and Lennox Lewis.
     
  6. wylan911

    wylan911 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,775
    53
    Sep 27, 2013
    I was referring moreso to the opponents he Defeated, and Wlad's era of dominance vs Tyson's era of dominance. You are right in that aspect that, as though Klitschko was in the era of thoe 2, he did not face them.
     
  7. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    76,097
    40,642
    Jan 22, 2015
    i Agree with this..
     
  8. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    76,097
    40,642
    Jan 22, 2015
    This is true but Tyson couldnt beat any of the guys you've mentioned.
     
  9. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    That's the whole point.

    If you took Holyfield and Lewis out of the equation and pretend they never existed would Tyson be seen as the best heavyweight from 85 onwards?

    Most likely.

    The point I'm trying to make is, Wlad doesn't share his era with other great fighters, hence why he has dominance.

    Would Wlad have had such long dominance if Vitali hadn't been his brother and they fought each other?
     
  10. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011

    It was irrelevant to begin with.
     
  11. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Tysons opposition was just as good as Wlads if not better.

    Wlad has had a lengthy reign im not denying or disputing that but Tyson too carved his name in boxing history with his reign.

    Tyson was a short guy in a big mans division, despite that, he destroyed much bigger men in the most dominating fashion seen at heavyweight and he ruled his division for 4 years.

    Wladmir, despite being the bigger guy has to hug, clinch, throw the occasional jab and right hand and win in the most risk free way possible. But his style works and he has dominated a decade I give him that
     
  12. wylan911

    wylan911 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,775
    53
    Sep 27, 2013
    Tyson did not share his time of dominance (which was only 4 years)with those fighters either. Not facing them anyway. You could equally asked had Tyson faced Lennox earlier would people see him as a potential ATG. See how that works
     
  13. wylan911

    wylan911 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,775
    53
    Sep 27, 2013
    I don't wanna turn this into a Wlad vs Mike debate. Or it's gonna come out how truly overrated I think Mike is (oops). lol
     
  14. wylan911

    wylan911 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,775
    53
    Sep 27, 2013
    :rofl:good
     
  15. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Tyson didn't really share his era with Lewis because Lewis turned pro in 89 I believe, near the end of Tysons reign.

    So realistically, Tyson Lewis had no chance of happening prior to Tysons prison stint.