If not Povetkin, who should Wilder fight next?

We've both repeated ourselves in this thread multiple times.... But it's clear that you're the emotional one here, not me....

 

Nope, he wont, like I explained anyone reasonable and not wilder hater like yourself would understand the reasoning behind it. The criticism will be mostly from the Wilder detractors trust me on that one.

I'm getting emotional? I'm not making **** up like you . When people start lying and making stuff up you know that's when they're getting emotional. You claimed I said champs are entitled to hometurf advantage and not that purse bids are not fair, but that purse bids go right out the window, because I claimed "champs" are entitled . You know you've lost when you have to stoop that low.

 

that's why you started putting words into my mouth right? and the only reason I'm repeating myself is to respond to your so called "explaining", and how you think that I've claimed that champs are entitled to hometurf advantage and purse bids go out the window. I repeated VACATE 50 times, so you'd get it through your thick skull that I'm saying they're entitled TO DROPPING their belt if they dont think the circumstances are fair. You just kept repeating yourself because you knew you were wrong.

 

Pretty clear that you think that..... You haven't exactly hid it from us.

Yes Wilder has every right to vacate his title whenever he wants.... If he does so to avoid facing Povetkin in Russia he will receive backlash from boxing journalists, and fans alike whether you like it or not. :good

 

So if that's what I think, why would I repeat that Wilder has every right to vacate like 50 times? Wouldn't I just say Wilder should not have to vacate? You make absolutely no sense.

Yep, he'd receive criticism, but the criticism will be mostly from the detractors, now go back to making **** up, maybe you'll win the argument that way .

 

Right.... You've made the same assertion again and again that everyone who isn't critical of Wilder, or racist will have no problem with him dropping the belt in order to avoid fighting Povetkin in Russia.

What am I making up???? I said that's what you THINK. You make it crystal clear in your posts that you think it's the champ who should be able to dictate where a fight is to take place. So what am I making up exactly?

 

No, what I'm saying is the MAJORITY of people who criticize Wilder will be people like you. The GGG fans, who also hate Wilder and Haymon but dont criticize their C level bum basher one bit . Of course there will be some reasonable non-racists that will criticize Wilder, but I can guarantee you the majority of people doing the criticism on this forum at least will be GGG fans/Haymon bashers.

You're making up that I think "and the fact that you seem to think that belt holders are entitled to hometurf advantage and that purse bids go out the window.", this when NOTHING I've said backs what you said up. I've made it clear that Wilder should vacate if this happens, if I thought that purse bids go out the window, wouldn't I say that Wilder shouldn't have to relinquish his title, and Povetkin should have to fight him in the US?

 

Either way arguing with you gets tedious, you love to put words in other people's mouths. Your favorite way to start a response is "So you're saying", and then you write something that I clearly did not imply. Then you start blabbing on and on about how I "think" that fighters are entitled to hometown turf and that purse bids go out the window, which in other words means Wilder doesn't have to vacate. Why can't you just get over the fact that you lost this argument? Your obsession and emotional hatred for Wilder is what caused you to start making these baseless assumptions. Stop being so emotional.

 

The real question is, when is Dustin Nichols getting his rematch?

 

If he wanna fight someone else, he should be quick, cause Team Povetkin will pressure the WBC for the fight immediately after the Wach victory!

 

Making excuses already? :rofl

 

Didn't Povetkin drag Wlad to Russia and still lose? Just sayin' ...

 

Unbelievable. After all the times Lennox fought in US, South Africa, Vitali fought in US, Russia, Poland(Adamek's backyard), Wlad fought in Russia, US and some other countries, people here are making up their own rules, pulling things out of their asses to justify a duck. Which is not even a certain thing, I don't think Wilder will drop the belt to avoid fighting Povetkin in Russia.

 

Yeah he will try all he could do to not fight Povetkin, whatever the fight is.
I didnt see any corruption or biased in Russia in the fight Wlad - Povetkin, so why should we think there will be biased judge or whatever you call it in Povetkin - Wilder if the fight took place in Russia.
Tho if the fight is in US i cant say the same thing ....
Wlad - Jennings for example. Referee decide to play it hard, but only against Klitschko, not a single warning for Jennings, for charging with head low, not a single warn for punch after the break from the exact referee, not a single warn for all the kidney punches from Jennings. And what he do is to ruin Wlad game with all this b**** calls, stops and warn for nothing. And im not talking about the clinches, but Wlad puts jabs, referee warn, Jennings spear him, referee warn Wlad ....
Holding should be reduced, but the guy who initiate clinches with charging, should be warn and their **** tactics to get inside should be reduced as well.
Pulev - Arias referee took a point from Arias, for charging with his head down and trying to get inside in that way.
Every ref. should do that.

 

Yep, and Povetkin sure as **** did not get any favors from the ref in that fight either.