Why is Wlad Klitschko Considered an ATG

Adding the dubbed changes it a bit. But then you were cognizant of that time, and remember no one saying he was one of the best?!? What you said though was He wasn't a ATG when he reached 20, you said nothing of he becoming later on, or anything to that effect. Once again I made NO mistake interpreting your message. And as I have stated a couple times already, I owned up to my mistake in saying 2nd all time in "consecutive" defenses.

Only mistake made here has been you. You have "interpreted" your own words. Very well, or you had trouble "interpreting" my response to it.

 

HWs are the most susceptible to getting knocked out, and even with his shaky chin Wlad has dominated for the past 10 years. Is he a top ATG hw? Hell no, but he is an ATG.

 

it doesn't change anything. "when he reached 20, he wasn't yet an ATG" clearly means when he reached 20, and not a single day after he reached 20, or I woud have written "after 20". Its been clear the meaning wasn't what you interpreted it as, from the first time I pointed it out your mistake, but you refused to believe it for 2 pages of thread length.

and you still refusing?
.[/quote]

 

you said it chewy.

awesome.

 

[/quote]

What is was though was....

That's what you sound like right about now

 

Buster 6'4
Wlad 6'6

And what does that mean?

Douglas was the much better boxer.

Just because his work ethic and desire were poor, doesnt mean he wasnt a good fighter.

 

I don't care what I sound like to you, I care what I actually wrote. that's the problem you are causing by relying on what things sound like to you instead of what they mean -

"he is now, but at the time he notched 20 defences he wasnt."

this is what I wrote, which refers specifically, blatantly and unequivocally to the time holmes reached 20 and not after that time, now I could be bothered to check my original post.

you flopped on understanding this point too, mate, ready to admit it yet?

 

And he showed he was a better boxer with his all of 1 championship win.

 

What you wrote was "He wasn't a ATG when he reached 20"

Is English not your 1st language? At this time, I'm not meaning that as a diss or anything. Because, in the English language, when you say "He wasn't a ATG when he reached 20", it might mean something different to us English speakers than whatever language you originally spoke.

 

Actually it means exactly that. atsch You might as well say Solis as a pro is a good fighter (which he isn't.....but might have been if he had work ethic and desire)

 

did you fcuk copy it from my post, you wrote that yourself. What you wrote is YOUR failed interpretation. Interesting that you've gone off on one in a your following post about my English. Irony never ceases with kliturds.

Now you can add lying to your list of failures.

 

I don't think at this point you even know what the H E double hockey sticks you're talking about. lol. That was what YOU wrote in your original post.

He wasn't a ATG when he reached 20.. Doesn't require any interpretation. If you meant more, you should have wrote more.

 

sticking by your lie of a "inventing a quote from me" in order to win your argument, eh?.

Not sure why you are bothering, anyone can see your lie clearly and blatantly. Why not just change your name to Wy-lie.

 

shame for your "facts" that you have to invent them, holmes is 2nd. He wasn't an ATG when he reached 20 either.

this is no longer even funny, writing " facts are facts" doesn't make a lie a fact, but can see why you want to feel that you NEED to write it.

Your 1st repsonse to me...

 

You do realize you can go back and look at what you wrote don't you.