Pretty much the same here. At this point, I'd say Brook is the more talented from a physical standpoint. He has a size and resch advantage. Resume's don't win fights, but Bradley has had far more experience and far better level of competition, plus he's had to dig deep, which is something we'll have to see if Brook can do.
Resume dont win fight? True but how do you build up resume??? Wining big fights, sure as hell not by talking about best fighters and fighting **** fight for 10+ years...
Brook has the power to stop the Frankie Gavin's of this world. Bradely is cut from a different cloth. Brook couldn't stagger a drunken Bradley.
68% KO wins vs laughable opposition and Brook fans believe he is Tommy Hearns i really love them pure comedy!
But Brook as well as Joshua and DeGale are not on PEDs yet every other boxer not from Britain is on PEDs, that includes past boxers...so clearly Brook>Hearns. Brook would beat Hearns and Hagler on the same night, by KO, in under 3 minutes -Super Hans
Bradley stopped a guy who has never been stopped with ripping hooks to the body... You don't want to be facing a guy like that if you're struggling to make the weight and are getting badly injured by body shots in training camp.
Bradley done what he was supposed to do in beating gatekeeper Rios. a career lightweight who has one basic win against Alvarado. Kell Brook resume recently is a lot stronger. He is a career welterweight, and has proven himself, in terms of skill and power. it will be a good fight, but I feel Bradley has reached the end. Tim does not have much power at 147, he barely beats Chavez, a man who never saw the distance against Thurman.(Watch how Kell deals with him BTW) The top Welters right now are Thurman, Errol Spence, Porter, Kell Brooke, Sadam Ali. and Tim Bradley, I feel Bradley will be competitive against all them, I feel Brook and Thurman 60/40 beating him. The rest would be 50/50 fights.
Brook in a tight decision, probably. I still don't fancy Bradley's chances against Brook, Thurman, or even Porter. Bradley at 147 in 2015 is not the same Bradley at 140 in 2010. His resume and skills are great there's no questioning that. But he hasn't beaten a single WW who had more than a handful of fights ever at the weight (I guess Abregu aside) and none against any with a top win at the weight (Marquez aside).
The fanboyism on here is incredible, could even called it being deluded, its a good fight no doubt, Bradley regardless of what anyone here says, does not have the power to hurt Brook, Vargas had the power to hurt Bradley, that's a fact and Brook also punches harder than him, no doubting that either. Bradley is a very good boxer and can outbox most people, however in this one I feel Brook is fundamentally strong enough not to be outboxed in this one, I can see him dropping early rounds to Bradley but I do see him winning more than Bradley over the 12 rounds. If this fight was 18 months ago I would have 100% backed Bradley, however Bradley hasn't progressed at all since then, if anything he has declined slightly, Brook has improved, granted he hasn't fought anyone near the level of Bradley recently so I understand people questioning that but overall I see Brook with a 116-112 points win or a late stoppage.