[url]http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12183/10070760/deontay-wilder-tells-anthony-joshua-ready-when-you-are[/url]
I admire your wishful thinking. Joshua fights patiently and picks his shots, his accuracy is underrated. This would be the reason why Wilder would lose. It's rather obvious he leaves himself too open at times.
He doesn't fight patiently. He expects to blast away his opponent within 3 rnds. Watching the Jason Gavern where he got frustrated and started fouling because gavern wasn't standing in front of him all night like the rest of the corpses he fought. It's laughable how people seem to think Joshua blasts out every opponent in the top 10 based on him fighting complete and utter bums. The guy hasn't gone past 3 rounds and he can easily beat the champ
Making the statement ''YDKSAB' doesn't make you sound any more knowledgeable that a turd. Watch his fights properly, then tell me he fights patiently. Next you are going to be telling me he fights like Lewis. Don't just believe what sky tells you, watch the fcking fights in full. If anyone out of the two fighters patiently, it's wilder who already displayed that he was more than just some one trick pony ko artist when he fought Stiverne Joshua is yet to display such patience because he hasn't even been past 3 rounds. Now you need to start providing a coherent argument instead of soundbites that you heard on your big back tv or you can gtfo this thread.
You're a fanboy, and in a fanboy's mind their daddy stops everyone. So its no point discussing anything with you is there? So we may as well just say that No one can beat Joshua right, he's invincible, he'd stop a truck driving at 100mph if he wanted to. The United Nations are in discussions with the boxing committee to ask if they can use Joshua as a soldier in war to stop terrorism.
Says you're still a fanboy with a FJ cap stitched on to your head Wilder, Fury, Povetkin, Ustinov,Wlad Haye, Parker, Pulev all ruin this overrated fraud at this point in his career. Far too much experience and ring smarts barring (parker) and there are a myriad of gamplans of beating a glorified bodybuilder with decent power. Seen so many holes and mistakes in his game, that it would be a formality for the boxers above to beat him.
Wilder looks to be the most limited WBC champ I can remember in any division. He is the overhyped American boxing hope following a drought of epic proportions for the US. Aside from an out of shape and lacklustre Stiverne he has only fought tomato cans. AJ on the other hand is an overhyped PR machine who has only ever fought rusty old tomato cans and is Eddie Hearn's and Sky's great hope. AJ is truly unproven and he may well turn out to be the next best thing but he has literally fought nobody and has had the help of the red whilst beating awful opponents whose average age is close to 40. Too many stoppages have been premature by friendly referees and if he was so patient, accurate and powerful then they would be on the canvas twitching rather than being waved off whilst on their feet against the ropes.
Yes they are both frauds, but at this moment wilder has the better credentials and I'd favour him against FJ.
Wilder can say what he likes, who really takes him seriously? Joshua has a better resume already ffs Kevin Johnson is better than anything Wilder has faced