Why did Wlad insist on a rematch clause with Fury?

I,ll give Fury a 5% chance to win ( injury etc ) different worlds

 

I think that's just a formality. Most champs do that.

 

Some do for voluntary defenses. However, rematch clauses are almost never imposed for mandatories.

It's not going to matter anyway, since Fury is not in the same league in terms of ability. Wladimir will make it a non-issue on fight night. :bbb

 

It wouldn't have been if it got to pursebids, then the standard mandatory rules apply.
It actually already did, but then Fury's team instantly signed when some Russion Billionaire wanted to bid on it.

 

He can always lose a fight the way his brother lost vs Byrd. Dominate for 7-8 rounds and then withdraw due to some self inflicted, decapacitating injury.

If Lewis hadn't had a rematch clause vs Rahman, Rahman would probably never give him a rematch and Lewis would be ff'ed. It's a career/legacy saving insurance at times.

 

Because lightning doesn't strike twice

 

Well there's a chance that Wlad throws out his back and falls out of the ring while ktfoing fury with a crunching left hook. Wlad being crippled from said blown out back, wouldn't be able to climb back in and Fury would win by default due to still being in the ring albeit unconscious

 

Kinda like how Dustin Nichols lost to Wilder. After violently dropping Wilder, he walked out of the ring to pick up his order of bacon wrapped pork ribs at the ringside foodtruck and was counted out as a tko.

 

He also had the rematch clause for Francesco Pianeta and Alex Leapai.

 

Fairly common practice.

 

Pac had a rematch clause with Algieri.