Jack Johnson vs Joe Frazier

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by YesMySon, Nov 20, 2015.


  1. Berlenbach

    Berlenbach Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,191
    1,252
    Sep 27, 2011
    Johnson doesn't hit hard enough to keep Frazier off and I don't think he's durable enough to survive Frazier's onslaught. Frazier by TKO.
     
  2. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,527
    Apr 26, 2015
    Very few hwts had the physical strength of Johnson.
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    Frazier is way too much for Johnson, boxing had moved on so much by this stage.
     
  4. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,527
    Apr 26, 2015
    Johnson ate up fighters like Frazier. Joe has no chance.
     
  5. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,311
    12,586
    Mar 2, 2006
    I see Frazier going through Johnson for a short-cut. Johnson's style was clinch and fight in spurts. It made for a dull fight. He would be forced to work in this fight because Frazier is going to be working 3 minutes a round. Jack could try his clinching, but he would still be subjected to that withering body attack. I suppose he could also try to time Joe's bob and weave, but Joe wasn't exactly without whiskers either. Joe was so much more than a one-armed fighter and it really wasn't until years later I appreciated him, because I hated him back in the day. I was an Ali man through and through. But I can see no other outcome on this bout than Johnson getting stopped between the ninth and twelfth round.
     
  6. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,527
    Apr 26, 2015
    Johnson would tie Joe up in knots in close nullifying his body attack. No fighter who relied so much on one single punch is beating Johnson. Too clever, too good defensively.
     
  7. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,874
    Apr 30, 2006
    Johnson on points. I think he picks Joe apart when he's trying to get in range and ties him up well once he's there, especially under the old rule set.
     
  8. Nighttrain

    Nighttrain 'BOUT IT 'BOUT IT Full Member

    5,292
    976
    Nov 7, 2011
    Is hard to believe that boxing had not progressed over the 65 years in which it was at its peak popularity. If you don't want to rely on logic, then look at the video. The game had changed. A more recent example of the advances in the performances in a growing sport is MMA. Champions from 10 years ago would be unable to compete at the top levels today.
     
  9. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,527
    Apr 26, 2015
    I don't see any hwt today with the boxing skills of Johnson. The technical abilities to feint, block, slip, parry and then counter to vital areas of the body is a dead art in the hwt division. Fighters like Wlad are considered good and he has no concept of any of these key skills. Ali as another example was at his best 50 years ago yet no hwt champion since has exhibited his level of ability. The same can be said of Louis, Dempsey and Johnson.
     
  10. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,195
    80,270
    Aug 21, 2012
    I probably haven't seen enough footage of Johnson then. What I have seen him in, he doesn't look like the world beater people make him out to be. :think Maybe it's a side effect of fighting 25 round fights? Over the shorter stretch I have to take Frazier. Prime Frazier is probably the best man Johnson would have been in with.
     
  11. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,469
    13,006
    Oct 12, 2013

    The one armed fighter is a myth Frazier stopped quite a few fighters with his straight right. He was a great 2 handed fighter.
     
  12. Phil_Ivey_76

    Phil_Ivey_76 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,822
    175
    Aug 26, 2013
  13. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,568
    Jan 30, 2014
    You've probably seen the right footage. Very crafty fighter with great reflexes and timing who dominated little guys and opponents who had skills that would be considered laughably rudimentary today. Didn't fight in an era where guys had well-developed jabs or combination punching, so he was able to stalk guys with his hands low and evade their punches pretty easily. I think he'd be up against an entirely different challenge against a modern heavy like Frazier. But you can't trust your eyes or brain with this stuff-- better to just rely on the tall tales and stories spun by early 20th century ringwatchers.
     
  14. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    468
    Mar 13, 2010
    So.....28 year old Wladmir Klitscko would be unable to beat 38 year old Wladmir Klitscko?
     
  15. Hookandjab

    Hookandjab Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,618
    551
    Feb 19, 2014