Nat Fleisher's Top 10 Heavyweights

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by LXEX55, Nov 17, 2015.


  1. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,976
    2,242
    Sep 9, 2011
    kinda like joe louis then.
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,741
    52,822
    Feb 11, 2005
    Such bullsh#t.Holmes, Ali and Lewis all dropped the jab. Walso has the benefit of space and controls it well thru excellent body lean and footwork. Horrible Ana lysis. Just horrible.
     
  3. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,605
    Jan 30, 2014
    :lol: Meanwhile, some of the 180-lb "heavyweight" legends you've been romanticizing pranced around with their hands at waist level and rarely threw stiff jabs at all. :patsch
     
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,605
    Jan 30, 2014
    This is surreal. The list of skills and tactics used by modern fighters that were rarely if ever used by the pre-Dempsey greats is too lengthy to write out. There have been so many obvious advances in everything from footwork, stance/balance, combination punching, jabbing, etc. A lot of the specific tactics you've mentioned were far more valuable in a period where most heavies threw very few punches from distance, rarely threw fluid combinations, regularly fell in with their punches, used little effective lateral movement, and spent more time grappling with each other than throwing punches.
     
  5. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    65,987
    86,818
    Aug 21, 2012
    Yes, but they were so great and utilized such subtle skills that they could get away with it :roll:

    Honestly, I have been more depressed than impressed when watching past 'greats'. That's why I thought that maybe others have footage unavailable to us that is more flattering.

    I mean, there was a prime Sanders vs prime Willard thread a while back. If you simply LOOK at the two fighting there can be no friggin doubt in anybody's mind who is objective that Sanders is way better in every aspect except size where he gives up about 10lb. Yet people were picking Willard :nut Beats me.
     
  6. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    Many hwts had excellent jabs. Klit drops his jab every time he throws it. A great hwt would lay him out with that level of technical error. - Perry

    I hear that. Perry's stock continues to sink. In truth Wlad has an all time left jab and right cross that is pretty technical.
     
  7. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,539
    Apr 26, 2015
    Lewis was koed twice by right hands over that low left.

    Prime Ali and Holmes had the head movement to to avoid right hands.

    Greats such as Loughran, Tunney, Ali so many more fought with hands low and were able to avoid blows with correct boxing skills.

    Wlad in turn is wide open for right hands. It's the very sad state of hwt boxing today .....worst I have ever seen....that allows him to get away with it although he has been koed three times by nobodies let's not forget that.
     
    louis54 likes this.
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,741
    52,822
    Feb 11, 2005
    Worse than Leon Spinks winning the championship? Worse than guys like Roman, Coopman, Dunn, Zyggy, Daniels, Stander, Scott Frank, Tex Cobb, Rodriguez... getting title shots? Worse than a Jim Braddock or Marvin Hart or Tommy Burns or Jess Willard holding the strap?

    History would say it's the worst which you choose to see in today's division.
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  9. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    792
    Aug 17, 2015
    Yeah, you're just nitpicking here, Perry. The division is decent.

    Holmes was a sucker for the overhand right. Ali was a sucker for the left hook.
     
  10. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,605
    Jan 30, 2014
    Refusing to give proper credit to current fighters is nothing new, it seems.
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,965
    27,941
    Feb 15, 2006
    No and neither is the idea that modern fighters are better, due to the natural evolution of the sport.

    The camps that we see on this forum are almost comically mirrored in every era!
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,657
    51,449
    Mar 21, 2007
    Very weird thread, as is often guaranteed by this subject matter.

    No boxer gets to the top of the division and stays there while remaining active without being very very good at boxing. It does not happen, in any division. That shouldn't even need saying, but apparently it does.

    Anyone who thinks ye olden fighters aren't very good and has also seen Robinson and Tunney is delusional. Anyone who thinks Whitaker or Pacquiao or Mayweather can't "feint, slip or block" is lost. Everyone has different degrees of excellence, certainly, and it's not that you can't say x would beat y, but basing it upon when a fighter fought, for hte most part, is absurd. I'd agree that most footage that survives pre-Dempsey/Tunney shows a different kind of fighting but even then you have guys like Langord popping up looking terrifying. Boxing matured pretty quickly by my eye and has been producing absolutely wonderful fighters ever since.
     
    Gudetama and reznick like this.
  13. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,605
    Jan 30, 2014
    He reported the same listing in the February 1959 issue too (in an article explaining why Patterson didn't make his top 20).
     
  14. BlackCloud

    BlackCloud I detest the daily heavyweight threads Full Member

    3,200
    3,366
    Nov 22, 2012
    On a side note, where is Perry?
    He has logged on since his ban was up but not posted.
    Maybe his ego cannot accept the fact that he was reprimanded?
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    I agree. Joe Gans looks very similar to Floyd.

    I'd argue there's glimpses of brilliance even before that like Fitzsimmons etc.
     
    Gudetama likes this.