I watched this with german commentary which I don't understand, so was un influenced by the biased uk commentary but I thought klitchko won. the rounds were messy and very low scoring but when the champion is forcing what little action there is and the other guy is running about fooling with what little hair he has, I give those rounds to the champion. what did fury actually land? did he do enough to win the linear title from a long reigning champion? What happened to having to 'take' a mans title? fury would miss a jab and swing the head in, and klitchko would jab and hold, but he at least was landing it. one of the worst fights ive seen
I didn't think it was nearly as one sided as the ridiculous commentary suggested, and of course I disagree with some of the scores on here. Like those that had it 11-1. I definitely see a case for Wlad winning 4-5 rounds. It wasn't the blow out people are making it out to be.
It was. Klitty did absolutely NOTHING in that fight. Literally nothing. Guy looked like a lost puppy.
I dont know how anybody on planet earth thought Wlad won, let alone winning a single round. Wlads face was a mess. Lol.
I scored it 115-112 for Fury, but was generous with Klitschko in some rounds. I respect Klitschko a lot and I was rooting for him but he clearly lost.
i had fury by 2 rounds, 4 of my rounds were "what you like rounds" and could have gone either way. i think fury prob fought the better over the entire fight and deserved his win but this was no washout
I watched it with German commentary which I didn't understand too. I am a big Klitschko fan. I had the feeling that Klitschko was losing so I wasn't surprised two of the judges scored it 115-112 for Fury. I agree with that scoring.