Judging standards in boxing need to change, Fury horrible

First of all, a guy shouldn't be able to win a round by a margin of 2-3 punches. The standard for winning a round should be "did someone take a beating in this round."

The standard of judging is idiotic. I don't want to see this, and casual fans sure as hell don't want to see this.

This is a ****ing joke. Fury talks and walks and acts like a tough guy and then when it comes time to fight, he summons up the ***** to throw 1-2 substantive punches a round.

Up until round 11 or something like that all the rounds were draws. This is a joke. A guy can't win a fight by landing 2-3 more power punches than the other guy.

Fights like these should be judged draws and the fighters jeered. I remember Mike Tyson once said that a long time ago if a fighter STUNK OUT THE JOINT like these two did he'd not get paid. Well, obviously, you can't withhold the purse, but you oughtta ridicule them and say that NO ONE won this fight. No one fought until the 12th or so.

 

Are you two stupid?

I'm not here cheer leading for Wlad. I'm talking about boxing in general. These kind of rounds happen all the time and guys get them based on 2-3 punches.

That SHOULDN'T BE HAPPENING.

Its an idiotic standard. This is a goddamn fistfight. Someone has to do something of substance.

You're not OBLIGATED to score the round for someone. You score the round for a guy if he beats the other guy up. If no one does squat you score it a 10 10. We want to know who the bigger man is here, this is what this is, this is a fight.

 

But I'm not even talking about how miserable the fight was, I'm saying even if you got a round like any of the rounds in Hagler Hearns, if no one clearly beat the other guy up, if no one clearly dished out SUBSTANTIALLY more punishment, the round should be a draw, regardless of how action packed it was.

Rounds should be judged the way you'd judge a fistfight outside a bar. Someone has to beat the other guy up AND by a wide enough margin.

If we're playing chess you wouldn't say "I win because I came CLOSE to checkmating you."

 

I agree that we should be using more of the 10 points... first of all, its silly to have 10 points MUST, why not just hand out points for winning rounds rather than substracting them, who hte hell came up with that, but, yeah, I agree, more of the points should be given out for degrees of domination.

However, that's not the main problem. The biggest improvement would come from judges actually starting to hand out goddamn 10 10 rounds.


However, what ALSO should be instituted is that you need a certain margin of points in order to win a fight. Otherwise what you would get is fights like, well, say this one, where up until the 11th round or so no one did squat, so you'd get 11 drawn rounds and then someone wins based on one round.