:rofl :rofl :rofl Really hilarious that you mention Johnson as a "very good" win for Fury but It's not even a good win for Vitali who beat the better version of Kingpin without losing a round. And btw Hammer is on the same level as Manuel Charr, who's Vitali's worst title defence.
Keep trying, egg, one day you'll make a rationale point about something. Not on this thread, though. Answers above
Yeah, he goes back and forth like that all the time. When Fury struggled with Chisora it was cause he was "fat and childlike" but Vitali, who struggled less than Fury did, has no excuse despite being badly injured. I'd argue Charr was a level above Hammer, though, beat shot Johnson more convincingly, and had wins over Leapai, less shot Williams, and shot Grant. All much better than anything Hammer has done.
Why is it that when vits struggles he is injured? Maybe is it just because he is a poor paper champion ? Vitali has one of the worst records ever for someone that people argue to be ATG. Fury with two elite level wins, no quit jobs and no losses > vits
'Klitschko had a terrible injury in the chisora fight, that's why he performed poorly.' Has this been added to the klitschko excuse thread? This is despite the fact klitschko was still throwing high volume punches. Jesus
Repeating bs without any rationale doesn't make it anymore true. VK fringe top 10, consensus top 25 ATG HW. Fury: ???
In your Vitali loving mind yes. Just because you think that doesn't mean it's true. Fringe top 10....wow. Now I know you're crazy. Two seconds I'm away to look at my Tyson fury poster I bought today
A top 10 HW does not have a worse resume than Tyson fury. Although fury may end up in the top 10 one day
Repeating bs without any rationale doesn't make it anymore true. VK fringe top 10, consensus top 25 ATG HW. Fury: ???