Do you think "running" should be disqualifiable?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by GloriaAblaze, Dec 2, 2015.


  1. GloriaAblaze

    GloriaAblaze Active Member Full Member

    936
    0
    Nov 28, 2015
    Indeed, for some reason people think that running around the ring scared to engage is "good footwork" and "defense" when it's nothing more than cowardice. In the 50s these guys wouldn't be allowed to box and be told to **** off to 100 meters.
     
  2. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,130
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    Go to love these morons that still play the "sport is declining" card. :lol: We just had the biggest event in the sports history this year which broke all records, yet the sport is declining. Ironically too, one of the stars in that mega-fight is a pure defensive fighter and literally everyone(casuals included) knew this prior to purchasing the event.
     
  3. The OZ

    The OZ Guest

    This is correct, mate.
     
  4. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,130
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    Using ring generalship, movement and defensive tactics while also throwing/countering is not running. It's also very difficult to be able to fight that considering the stamina, intelligence and timing required to successfully apply it. Idiots like the thread starter will never understand this.

    Running is when a fighter simply moves away without throwing much or anything at all. A good example of running is DLH vs Trinidad's championship rounds.
     
  5. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,130
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    Cheers. :good
     
  6. GloriaAblaze

    GloriaAblaze Active Member Full Member

    936
    0
    Nov 28, 2015
    Yeah, and I mean exactly the second example so get off your high horse, you're not impressing anybody.
     
  7. wylan911

    wylan911 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,775
    53
    Sep 27, 2013
    Anyone who claims that the sport is declining in the past decade doesn't know what they are talking about. more PPV's have been purchased in the past 5 years than at anyother time in the sport, it just came back to network television. in 2015 we had the highest viewed fight in the history of the sport. the 2 biggest live gates of all time. Bro, you really with that statement opened your mouth, and stuck your foot right on in there.
     
  8. The OZ

    The OZ Guest

    Cheers!, carry on mate you're making some fine points!
     
  9. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    What could possibly go wrong?
     
  10. GloriaAblaze

    GloriaAblaze Active Member Full Member

    936
    0
    Nov 28, 2015
    Lol yeah, and guess what - those two fighters are gone. I'm talking about the sport as a whole, HBO reduced it's budget, PBC hasn't exactly been a huge success and Haymon is losing money, I don't have numbers on this but I bet the average viewership is going down too.

    Using a couple of instances doesn't make for a good point, sorry bro.
     
  11. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,130
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    You meant my second point yet idiotically used Wladimir's performance against Fury as an example. :lol: How was Wladimir, who was clearly the aggressor for the most part, running from anyone?. He was pursuing Fury and Fury, using movement and counter punching, never gave him the right position to throw anything. Even when Wladimir did throw, he just threw ineffective shots to look like he's still there because he was never given the right positioning to unload effective shots. Wladimir was mostly desperate in this fight and the reason behind that was Fury.

    No, you don't mean "the second part" because your example has absolutely nothing to do with running and reluctance. The inability to throw punches isn't always due to running, it can be due to the defensive opponent's ability to nullify your attacks using movement and therefore reducing you to a frustrated confused position you have no idea how to get out of. If you expected Wladimir to charge brainlessly and swing wildly to keep the sport "in a good state" to morons like you, then I suggest you head off to YouTube and start watching street fights. You can judge the greatness there all you want without worrying about that type of activity ever being in a bad state.

    Running is rather basic and easy to spot, even to clueless fans like you. It's simply one fighter running around the ring without throwing anything at all. Fighters do get warnings for that.
     
  12. GloriaAblaze

    GloriaAblaze Active Member Full Member

    936
    0
    Nov 28, 2015
    What, are you saying in the 21st century it's impossible to make a safe ring in which the ropes can be adjusted to different sizes?
     
  13. caligula4

    caligula4 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,764
    886
    Jul 13, 2011
    Yes, and he paid for it on the scorecards.
     
  14. The OZ

    The OZ Guest

    It would never work chap.
     
  15. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    I'm sure it can be done. Doesn't mean it should be. Doesn't mean it offers the same structural integrity and safety. The sport also isn't only about the larger events. Smaller cards with small budgets and venues won't be able to afford it. Fighters will then be fighting in one size coming up and then possibly another when they hit the bigger venues. Uniform throughout eliminates that.