People actually thought Quillin was better then David lemieux?

David beat Rosado and ndam much more convincingly then quillin and also knocked out guurerro in 3 rounds but it took peter 7 rounds in a tough back and fourth fight to stop him

 

So that makes Lemieux better?

 

Ah triangle theory. I see.

 

He hits a lot harder and has been better then peter (common opponents)

 

Qulllin folded against a guy who is not even that good IN THE FIRST ROUND

 

He's better and is more accomplished lee stops Lemieux.

 

Okay, that's your opinion.

 

andy lee the one who got stopped by chavez and vera ?

The best mw is the division other then the king is david at the moment

 

It happens in boxing. Would you have said the same when Pemieux was getting destroyed against journeymen?? It's all relative. A fighter isnmt as great as he looks on his best night, nor as bad as he looks on his worst.

Before last night, if GGG had beaten Quillin, it would have been viewed ss his best win. Although, personally, I like Murray better than both.

 

Quillan and Lemieux are about the same. GGG dominates both of them. Clearly on another level from them.
Kudos to Jacobs great performance.

 

No it wouldn't countless of threads ****ting on qullin even before he got stopped

murray and david are better fighters

 

You realise Lemieux was once outpointed by Joachim Alcine right?

 

Suit yourself. Nobody was saying that Lemieux was the guy that GGG needed to beat to clean out the division. Quillin was the main obstacle. Quillin would have been GGG's signature win.

 

Quillin, Lemieux, Lee, Jacobs are all pretty much on the same level.

 

shut up people say GGG should of fought ward because they know that would be a test quillin is no test

they are all bums to him