^ This is exactly what I'm talking about and why I have no respect for Wilder bashers. They can't be accurate and take nothing into account except what suits their argument, and distort the truth. Any reasonable person knows Stiverne only lost to Demtrice King on a bad stoppage early in his career. And he was hugely overweight when he fought Rossy. Wilder did get a knockdown on Stiverne that was not counted because the ref didn't see Stiverne take his legs out from under him. Like I said, I don't have a problem with people criticizing Wilder, just don't use double standards, be accurate and quit distorting things.
I have no doubt that if Parker got a chance to fight Wilder in the middle of next year, Parker will KO him within 5 rounds. There will be no way Wilder could strut around in the ring and start windmilling off on Parker. It'll be a school lesson.
Which is exactly what you did there with Stiverne and Rossy argument.. I still think Stiverne wasn't a good test, fell into a title beating overweight fringe challenger. Nothing else on his resume. How does his weight affect his chin??? Knock down in round 1 by Rossy so I would assume Stiverne wasn't gassed.. Stiverne was rocked by Wilder went for clinch and he feel down with him. If he was ko'd he would't have tried to clinch. Bottom line is it wasn't a knock down because they both fell down... No different to me saying if Molina knew how to finish opponents Wilder would have been ko'd and Molina would have been champ..
He fought 1 top 10 guy Stiverne. Couldn't put him down. Next fight that guy gets knocked down by a journeyman. What does this tell us?
I never said Stiverne was knocked out. I said he went down. The ref missed the legit knockdown because pulled his feet and got him off balance. He went down from Wilder's punch. You made this huge deal about Rossy knocking Stiverne down and how Wilder couldn't. And even if Molina knocked Wilder down, no guarantee he stayed down. He took a shot, stunned him for a moment and he shrugged it off.
Get Wilders **** out of your mouth fanboy. Even people who don't bash Wilder think Parker, and Joshua look better. Maybe you don't have eyes? 'technical words' LOL............... By pointing out that Parker and Joshua CLEARLY have better technique?
dude, you kill your own credibility with every post. You just try way to hard. Its blatantly obvious you got a negative bias towards him. Parker has fought absolutely NO ONE, and neither has Joshua. Technique of course can look good against complete bums. You can call me a fanboy all you want I do at least admit I'm not sold on Wilder. You give him zero chance against anybody above club fighter level.
I'd say Wilder's power is a bit over rated. He has power though. But not Felix Savon type ****. When Wilder gets into that mode of arm punching and winging hooks with horrible technique, he negates the natural power that he has. On rare occasions when he sits down on a right hand with proper technique, he can bang though.
Yet you seem to think this is acceptable for Wilder... Again the difference is Wilder has a belt, Parker and Joshua are nothing more than prospects, when they have a belt I would hope their CV's aere far better than Wilders.
I'm not the one sitting here saying that Parker and Joshua are absolute locks to lose to anyone with a pulse like you guys do Wilder.