Let's compare chins using stats. The USA have 5 times the population of the UK. The top 10 fighters in the UK (according to boxrec) have been stopped 2 times between them (both Khan), meaning top UK boxers get stopped 0.2 times per top fighter. The top 50 fighters in the USA have been stopped a total of 24 times. Meaning they are stopped 0.48 times per top fighter. The conclusion to draw is that Britain have better mandibles than Americans in general. That is all. [YT]4lPiodCY4UA[/YT]
Hey ******* how many threads of yours have been erased for nationalistic trolling this week? If you have a problem with Americans then why don't you put your keyboard down and go out and actually fight someone.
I have the Definitive Answer to the Question, using my own numbers. GLASS JAW TALLY By Nation 47 KO losses in Russia's Boxrec Top 100 Russian Fighters 72 KO losses in USA's Boxrec Top 100 US Fighters This content is protected KO losses in UK's Boxrec Top 100 UK Fightersshock: Glassiest Jaws Per Capita The UK deal:deal Second Place US Iron Chin Award Goes to Mother Russia
A poll was done on here were hundreds of posters voted. England was voted as the glassiest country in the world country by a rather large margin.
They just started, give it some time for the roids to wear off so we can see those armor ***** in those strong masculine square chin's.
That's not per capita, this is discussing glass chins per capita. America have 5 times the population of the UK. Amount of times top UK boxers KO'd 0.2 times Amount of time top USA boxers KO'd This content is protected This content is protected
But butthurt Americans like yourself can't admit that their fighters have the most glass jaws. That was a poll of irrelevant trolls. This is based on fact. :hi:
The title of this thread is 'glass chins per capita'. And the simple fact is, if you are American, you are more likely to have a glass chin than a Brit :nod
USA have 5 times the population of the UK. Your top 50 fighters are stopped more times than our top 10. I provided the statistical data in the first post
10 and 50 is arbitrary - it could just as easily be 5 and 25 or 17 and 85. Does the result stand with the same ratios at different cut-offs?
Correction since Boxrec dropped Michael Sprott from the UK's top 100 the UK KO rating has gotten way better :rofl There's new rankings. UK This content is protected KO's in Top 100 US 71 KO's in Top 100 You guys are still in the lead though.:deal