Jack Johnson vs Mike Tyson

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by swagdelfadeel, Dec 9, 2015.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,964
    27,937
    Feb 15, 2006
    I can see a couple of things that have been lost over the years.

    The poverty that fighters like Jack Johnson and Joe Walcott operated under early in their careers, forced them to adopt styles of boxing that emphasised economy of effort. You don’t really see that in the heavyweight division any more.

    You don’t really see hard punching defensive specialists any more, outside of the superheavyweights. Fighters like Johnson, Schmeling, and Walcott, would have been developed as offensive specialists today.
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,724
    52,805
    Feb 11, 2005
    Yes there was. His competition. The footage of those guys shows very primitive skills, very primitive single shot attacks, and the better of the fighters he faced were physically inferior to the 6 foot 180-210 pound Johnson. That would not be the case against a prime Tyson who was only an inch or so shorter and at least as strong, if not stronger.
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,964
    27,937
    Feb 15, 2006
    OK so what would we expect to see on film?

    Were they regarded as boxing geniuses of their era?

    Burns was seen as a brilliant technical infighter, and this is upheld in his other fights, but Johnson just takes his game away.

    Ketchel and Flynn, seem to have been regarded as being at the less technical end of the spectrum. I will admit that neither impresses.

    McVea was seen as more of a puncher, but he still displays some skills on film.

    You have to consider the possibility that you might be looking at Shannon Briggs, and judging te technical skills of the era based on him.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    I don't think Johnson is primitive tbh. I think his punch output is horrifically low but that is more to do with the era he fought in.
     
  5. latineg

    latineg user of dude wipes Full Member

    22,077
    16,732
    Jun 4, 2009
    its weird without "foxy" around to pollute Tyson threads with his hate claiming that anyone that approved of Tyson was subhuman and approved of ra-pe etc :huh :-( :nono

    I think Tyson would beat Jack Johnson, imo, its a "guess" but that's my guess. Not because I think Tyson was or wasn't a bad fella but just because I think he would win. That speed from a power hitter was shocking for our time and that was 30 years ago.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,964
    27,937
    Feb 15, 2006
    The best that you can ever do is to make your best prediction based on the evidence available.

    These threads are nothing more than a search for the prediction that best fits the evidence.
     
  7. latineg

    latineg user of dude wipes Full Member

    22,077
    16,732
    Jun 4, 2009
    yes and in a sport whereby one well timed punch can change everything :bbb
     
  8. Reason123

    Reason123 Not here for the science fiction. Full Member

    1,113
    270
    Jul 27, 2015
    I'll go with Johnson by decision in a fun fight to watch. Tyson never beat anyone that impressed me anymore than Johnson's opponents.
     
  9. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,724
    52,805
    Feb 11, 2005
    Larry Holmes, Tony Tubbs, Razor Ruddock, Frank Bruno, Bonecrusher Smith, Tony Tucker, Mike Spinks, Pinky Thomas look like McVey or Burns or O'Brien or Ketchell or a 100 year old Jeffries exactly how?

    Here's some footage of arguably the best heavyweight Johnson ever beat. Devastating stuff...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pay6XBYfnRc
     
  10. Reason123

    Reason123 Not here for the science fiction. Full Member

    1,113
    270
    Jul 27, 2015
    I didn't say they looked a like I just said they didn't impress me anymore. Yes, Johnson's competition looked unskilled but Tyson's all looked to scared to do anything with him. Which to makes them looks very unskilled. With the exception of Larry Holmes who was old and way past it. Mike Spinks and the rest all let him do what he wanted. Scared to death of him.

    So Johnson beat some unskilled guys and Tyson beat a bunch of scarredy cats and an old man is how I see it. That's why Tyson's wins don't impress me anymore than Johnson's.
     
  11. DrBanzai

    DrBanzai Active Member Full Member

    1,390
    23
    May 11, 2012
    Tyson never beat a great fighter in his life, this fight would be the same.
     
  12. Berlenbach

    Berlenbach Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,191
    1,254
    Sep 27, 2011
    Razor Ruddock, Larry Holmes, Pinklon Thomas, Bonecrusher Smith, Trevor Berbick and the rest were all big strong capable heavyweights. Most were world champions and had long spells in the top 10. And they were all a bunch of scaredy cats? Really?

    Talking of being scared, how do you think little Burns, O'Brien, Fitz, Ketchel and Langford felt when they were staring up at the Galveston Giant? Tyson wouldn't even be allowed to fight those guys.
     
  13. Roger Federer

    Roger Federer Active Member Full Member

    1,148
    17
    Oct 6, 2014
    It's hard to give Johnson much of a chance here. Maybe he can tie up and frustrate tyson for awhile like a Bonecrusher Smith did but I can't see him living with Mike's explosive and powerful combinations.
     
  14. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,605
    Jan 30, 2014
    I take it you haven't actually seen many of Tyson's fights? Many of the guys he fought clearly weren't "scared" of him until after he hurt them. Did Ruddock look like a "scaredy cat"? Did Berbick? Tubbs? Bruno? Pinklon Thomas?
     
  15. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    256
    Feb 5, 2005
    Yes Foxy, much like Donald Trump, wasn't shy about expressing an opinion, even it if is often way over the top.