Another dumbass that thinks that he is smarter than someone else. I am through wasting my time with you.
He did. And then he broke the rules himself by taking an IV which could have masked his own substance abuse (if, indeed, he was juicing, which we have no proof of).
That's how he passes the test. One thing some people fail to understand is that, what he did is a direct violation of the WADA code. He doesn't need to fail a test after doing what he did. What he did is not any different than injecting himself with anabolic steroids on live TV right after the weigh-in and saying "I'm lovin' this" to the zooming cameras with a grinning face. That would be a violation of the anti-doping code; just like what he did WAS. The only problem is, why the US judiciary system turned a blind eye to this and destroyed it's reputation. US was never meant to be a place where you can bribe your way out of prison. It's really a shame.
I think a 5 year old can understand the point I am making. If you're getting confused perhaps you need to step away from the subject.
Do you have proof that he took IVs before the other tests also? If not then you can not say definitively that that is how he passed the earlier tests.
Also? What do you mean also? Getting caught once is not enough? How many times does one need to cheat to be called a cheat?
Is it reasonable to think he may have taken iv before? Or was it an one time deal because he needed minerals after a hard training?
He was caught taking an IV not taking peds. I think there is a difference. No doubt he broke the rules taking the IV but, by itself, it doesn't prove he was doping.
Actually it's the same. Getting caught with a masking agent = doping. Maybe you're too dumb, instead you argue chicken or egg?