I'm fine with Kovalev actually being the harder puncher but I can't dispute how Pascal might feel about it. That's all I am saying.
You're talking about logic, but how does the Rios-Abril robbery have anything to do with it? Just because Pascal got stopped against Kovalev doesn't mean Froch isn't the more hurtful puncher. Kovalev stopped a shopworn, past prime Pascal that Froch and numerous others already softened up for him.
You seem quite obsessed with fighters dying or being 'killed' in the ring. Its really quite distasteful.
My point is that rios believes he beat Abril when he clearly didn't. You can't take a fighters word for something just because they were in the ring, if all the other evidence shows otherwise.
Lol at the minority that desperately want this rubbish to be true. Because you know, Ward beat Froch, and this somehow validates Ward more in their twisted minds. I'm all for taking a man at his word, but when one punches but has no effect on him and the other is knocking him senseless with arm punches where his feet were not even set. The answer is obvious, I don't care what he says.
Why would I be, someone who calls themselves that are clearly overcompensating for something they lack.:deal Jelly? So you're flaming douchebag too.:rofl