Sad thing about you is the fact that when GGG takes out Jacobs you will give him 0 credit and will continue to say "WHO has he beaten" , same when he beats Canelo ..... there will be no way you give him credit , but whatever man... if you really think he is #3 MW then i really cant take you to be anything but a troll
So, are you asking me to give Bumlovkin credit for fights that haven't happened? Am I reading you correctly?
No , try and be .... objective , look at the fights he DID take and try to assess who is the best MW today , because they didnt face each other (your #1,#2) , try on the back of boxing ****ysis .... this is not a time to summarize carrer and look at resumes and compare fighters , this are primed fighther still going at it , he has the belts so he can be compared vs the other champs , do it , compare them boxing wise and then rank them , currently until they meet there is no other way. he had solid fights , true he hasnt beaten any world beaters yet , but solid comp. once you finished your boxing ****aysis let me know your rankings , if they are the same , fine , but i hope they wont be.
I did that already. Fact is, Jacobs KO1 Quillin is the best recent win among the active contenders @ 160. Therefore, I argue that Jacobs is the true #1 contender at the weight...
Is that the same idiot who claimed Quillin's win over Hassan N'dam is better than anything on GGG's resume? :rofl