Prime Roy would beat prime Calzaghe at 168

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by David Hanssen, Oct 6, 2014.


  1. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super Oneā„¢ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013
    Get real. Even shot Zaggers took Roid apart
     
  2. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,816
    2,958
    Dec 11, 2009
    No revised anything fool :patsch

    Forget that Jones lost to Calzaghe and consider -

    Jones lost to Johnson who lost to Sheika who lost to Calzaghe
    Jones lost to Hopkins who lost to Calzaghe
    Jones lost to Griffin who lost to Johnson who lost to Sheika who lost to Calzaghe
    Jones lost to Maccarinelli who lost to Braehmer who lost to Veit who lost to Calzaghe
    Jones lost to Tarver who lost to Hopkins who lost to Calzaghe
    Jones lost to Green who lost to Mundine who lost to kessler who lost to Calzaghe
    Jones lost to Lebedev who lost to G Jones who lost to Noel who lost to Benn who lost to Eubank who lost to Calzaghe

    Lesson over

    Nothing revised about the above and I didnt need to add that Jones was beaten by end of career, bloated, Calzaghe
     
  3. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010

    you've just once again added in the failed arguments that entail after jones was fading (tarver) and later shot (all the others) HAHA! even calzaghe admitted jones was shot. thats a true fail when the person you are trying to defend shoots you down. Sarah Palin couldn't do better.


    just get over the fact that joe waited till the legends were reaching 40something, before getting brave and calling them out. hes the first smw champion to do so (and one of the few in any weight category), you should be proud that joe made such history.
     
  4. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,816
    2,958
    Dec 11, 2009
    Show me one link where Calzaghe used the words SHOT. Watch Herols first duck of this post
    40 somethings indicate that people are in their 40s, so what fight other than Hopkins did Calzaghe face a fighter in his 40s in?. Here comes the second duck
     
  5. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    oh so the word SHOT is the important thing, it is failey.

    Not the hoard of other evidence that shows joe knew jones was finished.

    you concentrate on the word, failey, thats what you are good at, and ignore the evidence.
     
  6. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,816
    2,958
    Dec 11, 2009
    Told you there would be a duck and Herol did 2 in one post :thumbsup. Must be why he uses the word failey so often :thumbsup
     
  7. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    cant really duck something that doesn't exist, failey, because your argument is invalid.

    I clearly and blatantly said "were (in the process of) reaching 40something", but you conveniently read it as are "(already) reached 40something" so as to avoid your embarrassing failure.


    picking on syntax once again so as to avoid answering - another classic failey fail.

    well now you know, and now you can ignore it all again in your next post, lets see if you do.
     
  8. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    faileys your name, don't wear it out.

    so why you choosing to ignore that your own hero shot your argument down?
     
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,816
    2,958
    Dec 11, 2009
    Does this count as 6 ducks now from Herol where he keeps posting and not answering the question?
    Now he comes out with someone of 39 is closing up to 40 something :patsch rather than 40 :patsch:nut:lol:. Surely this stupidity cant be normal and further cements what I have thought before about Herol following me around like a stalker :dead
     
  10. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    40something means someone between 40 ad 49 inclusive. Failey u need to buy a new dictionary.

    so u are still pretending that someone 39 and 11 months isn't someone who is very close to reaching 40something.

    keep it up, failey. remember never to admit when u r wrong.
     
  11. Ukansodoff

    Ukansodoff Deontay plz stop ducking Joshua. Thank you. Full Member

    10,980
    6,711
    Aug 7, 2010
    I think a prime RJJ DOES beat Calzaghe but all that would of been was a great big advert for the promotion of performance enhancing drugs.

    A prime RJJ not on a concoction of Peds does not beat Calzaghe.
     
  12. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,816
    2,958
    Dec 11, 2009
    :patsch
    A dictionary is going to explain that :patsch. Like I said the stupidity is endless with Herol who now doesnt know what a dictionary is used for.
    If someone is 39 and 11 months they are close to reaching 40, not 40 something :patsch
    Like I said, Herols stupidity is endless as shown again and twice in one small post as well as a ducker. Failey really is Herols new name
     
  13. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    This is all Cal sloppy fans have ..No versions of Joe beats a prime Roy this is why he avoided him like the plague when he was in his prime ..

    Joe was never in Jones class and never was this is why he waited for him to get knocked out twice and to lose his legs before sharing the ring with him..Actions spoke louder than accusations ..:hi:
     
  14. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,816
    2,958
    Dec 11, 2009
    Why do you not like addressing all of the issues that the poster raised?
    What I did see was end of career, faded, bloated Calzaghe in only his 2nd LHW title fight beat Jones
     
  15. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    Failey y u pretending that someoneelses name is failey, when its your name.

    More importantly, Failey why u still pretending that 40something doesn't include the age 40?

    Man, I guess the moment you admit your mistake with that word, you admit your argument fails, no wonder you are sticking with the wrong definition.

    Bu you know what, I say - keep it up, this is awesome seeing you blindly stick with the wrong definition in front of the whole world. every next post of yours just increases the error when you don't admit the mistake.