Billy Joe Saunders: The Superb One-Pure Bare Knuckled Middleweight Gypsy Slickness.

I never said it was a draw you dope. I said it was close and that the knockdowns decided it. I had BJS winning, but it was not a masterclass as you're saying.

 

:thumbsup Exactly. saunders basically does what floyd does in most of his fights, when he lands his jab, and the opponent aint landing anything - lee did but only at the end. It wins you the fight, Saunders has the advantage of being able to hurt his opponent to.

 

Anyways...


BJS needs to walk out to this or another Django tune.

[yt]nS2ylPAUxzA[/yt]

 

Saunders should not be mentioned in the same breath as Golovkin....GGG Batters him in 5.!!!!

 

And the rounds with not much between them where they were landing jab for jab? Yeah ok... Take your rose tinted goggles off Brit****.

 

Saunders is good but he just barely s****es by his biggest fights. GGG would decimates him. That said BJS might be a top 3 MW in the world so credit to him.

 

even rounds there were, but bjs showed a superior jab, but lee closed it up okay. but was 4rounds behind. i had saunders by 2.

now **** off kindly ya twot.

 

Ok that's fair. So then you agree that it was a close fight mostly decided by knockdowns and nowhere near a masterclass performance.

 

Great win, but now he has a belt and has no excuse for ducking GGG.

 

How long before the Brits try to arrest him?

 

I dont agree with cst80's card but you are a very angry man who picks on everything especially since fury took wlad to school, ill watch it again soon. I scored the saunders vs eubank fight 8-4 watching it over 20times. This one seemed closer, but there were even rounds. Lee not winning rounds when he was far behind on the cards only until the 8-12th did he nick some, means he lost fairly.

 

I'm not picking at anything lol... I give BJS full credit. It's just insulting to Lee (who I'm obviously a big fan of) to say it wasn't a competitive fight.