And you'll be losing that money. I laid out first time round the advantages Fury has over Wlad. Quite amazing really that people can't see the gulf in natural skill between the two men. I do wonder at times what others are actually seeing. As before, if Fury comes in focussed and in shape (no guarantee) he will TOY with Wlad. He's another level of skill, different league. For me, the biggest surprise was the last round when Wlad really went for it, I thought this was his most successful part of the fight and definitely the closest he came to wobbling/stopping Fury. If he can really take it to Fury and send the bombs flying he may well make this a 50-50 fight. Any other style he produces sees him being out-classed badly IMO. Go out on your shield Wlad, you might just land that bomb!:bbb
Not so. Fury could be from Hawaii and it would make no difference to WHAT I SEE. I suppose the fact Fury already beat the man convincingly is no factor? If you genuinely think Wlad out-boxes an 'in-shape Fury' and beats him on points next fight, you are either the most deluded This content is protected fan-boy or someone who cannot ****yse boxing at all.
He won by a couple of rounds in an awful fight. He was the better man on the night sure, but to suggest he has more skill and would have beaten Wlad at any point in his career is absurd.
I think for Wlad to win Fury will have to make mistakes. He has to get arrogant in the ring, let his hands down like he did, gas out in the 12th again. If Fury is just a tad better, has better stamina than in the first fight and makes no mistakes I don't see realistically how old Wlad can win this.
Under normal circumstances- if Wlad did not look 40 years old in his last 2 fights, and looked shot and gun shy against both Jennings and Fury...I would be predicting that he would lay Fury out in a rematch. But this is not the Wlad of even 3 years ago- the man is fighting now like a 40 year old, he is fighting like a gun shy and shot fighter. I think that second fight plays out like the first fight...but with a little more action and Fury still getting the decision win.
The Wlad of 3 years ago would have beaten Fury...and any other version going back in time...up until his last loss over 10 years ago now.
As simple as that is it?:nut How did Wlad and his corner , with about 80 years experience between them , not know that all he had to do to win the fight was 'just let his hands go' ?? Would Wlad had won if he had some clueless nobody like you in his corner? All Andy Lee had to last week is simply let his hands go and he would have won. Manny could have won no problem at all if he let his hands go against Mayweather. These guys should hire trainer like you. It seems all you have to do to win a fight is go out and swing punches.atsch
Good post I think the statement to just" let his hands go" is boldly posted so freely and often by armchair trainers it's comical there's more to it than Merely deciding to " lett your hands go" lol you have to have an opportunity and an opening. You have to have the reach as it correlates to the distance as well But I guess if a fighter is to take the advice and just "let his hands go ",even if he ends up flailing in the air, he still has a good chance as he followed the coaching set forth by the highly knowledgable armchair trainers Kidding.....I think lol I think I also recall steward telling Wlad to let his hands go in one of those chewing him out sessions between rounds yes. But that said you do have to create or find a means/ opportunity to let your hands go IN as I see it, from my armchair, anyway. Lol