Which fight was more entertaining: Hagler-Hearns or Hamed-Kelley

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Jay1990, Dec 31, 2015.

  1. Jay1990

    Jay1990 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2015
    Messages:
    938
    Likes Received:
    193
    Tell me what you think???
     
  2. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2015
    Messages:
    6,759
    Likes Received:
    10,140
    Hagler vs Hearns Simply because those two fighters are A.T.G'S .
     
  3. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2014
    Messages:
    10,928
    Likes Received:
    6,810
    Kelley was way past his prime when he faced Hamed. I guess it's exciting for some to watch a guy bounce off the canvas many times. Once Hamed faced a really good prime champion type, he got exposed.
     
  4. Ken Ashcroft

    Ken Ashcroft Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2008
    Messages:
    5,726
    Likes Received:
    6,250
    It was exciting for the fact that both guys on and off the canvas and that it could have ended with either man being KOed.
     
  5. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2014
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    93
    Hamed-Kelley. Hagler-Hearns was too one sided.
     
  6. turnip

    turnip Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2015
    Messages:
    3,115
    Likes Received:
    39
    Hagler hearns was better because in the lead up to the fight no could predict what was about to happen.when it happened it was a war.
     
  7. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2014
    Messages:
    13,452
    Likes Received:
    2,993
    :verysad
     
  8. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    12,227
    Likes Received:
    1,259
    Hagler Hearns by a universe.
     
  9. Nighttrain

    Nighttrain 'BOUT IT 'BOUT IT Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2011
    Messages:
    5,292
    Likes Received:
    977
    Hagler vs Hearns two superstars acting like they had nothing to lose!
     
  10. Richmondpete

    Richmondpete Real fighters do road work Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2015
    Messages:
    7,140
    Likes Received:
    5,029
    Hagler v Hearns for the reason that it was two of the all time titans of the sport. Hamed v Kelley because I really, really wanted to see Hamed get ktfo
     
  11. TerribleTerry73

    TerribleTerry73 Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2016
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    9
    Hagler vs. Hearns, just because it was two ATG's going all out.
     
  12. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2015
    Messages:
    9,343
    Likes Received:
    1,539
    I remember watching both fights live. Kelly was soooooo sure he was going to KO Hamed. He could have pulled off the trick but in his excitement and carelessness ran square into a KO blow.
     
  13. expljose

    expljose Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2013
    Messages:
    1,259
    Likes Received:
    447
    both were very entertaining no need to be militant
     
  14. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    20,273
    Likes Received:
    6,588
    If Kelly wasn't past it when he fought Hamed, then he wasn't as good as we thought in the 1st place because in the 2 1/2 years leading up to the Hamed fight, he was stopped by good, not great Alejandro Gonzalez and he had 2 draws against good, not great fighters: Tommy Parks and Clarence I forgot his last name. Banks maybe?
     
  15. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    20,273
    Likes Received:
    6,588
    Yes but Hagler Hearns was a fight of 2 atgs. Hamed Kelly wasn't.