What most people don't understand about Frazier-Foreman II.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by swagdelfadeel, Jan 5, 2016.


  1. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    18,692
    19,826
    Jul 30, 2014
    As most of you may know, I'm one of the very few who thinks Prime Frazier beats Foreman. One of my reasons is a big one that most people don't understand. I've posted this here before.

    As most, if not all, of you know, Joe was shot for Foreman II, progressively arthritic, nearly 25 pounds above his peak weight, legally blind, to the point where he went in to the fight, wearing contact lens to try to restore some of his vision "which got knocked out."

    What you don't know however, is despite all of these problems, Frazier lasted longer on his feet than any defeated opponent of George's in his wins between Peralta II and Jimmy Young. That gets overlooked. Lyle got dropped twice in the fourth, while Pires, although never knocked off his feet, did not answer the bell for round five. Old, arthritic, overweight and blind Joe Frazier is the ONLY one of Foreman's defeated opponents between Peralta II and Young to answer the bell for round five without having yet been dropped in the match. :think

    So it's not to hard to invision Prime Frazier getting past the early rounds against Foreman, taking him to deep waters, and drowning him. At the very least, we don't have to wonder if Frazier could get out of the early rounds against Foreman. He did.
     
    Azik and InMemoryofJakeLamotta like this.
  2. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,524
    Apr 26, 2015
    Oh my god. Pure garbage. If Foreman had fought in the manner of prime Foreman their second bout would not have lasted two rounds. What you see in fight two is a very much slowed down version of the wrecking machine from 1973. This is the primary reason Joe lasted nearly five rounds. Five rounds of a gradual beat down.
     
  3. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    18,692
    19,826
    Jul 30, 2014
    This is irrelevant because he still faced and lasted longer against the same Foreman than anyone from 1976-1977.

    But I'll refute it anyways. I wouldn't say Foreman was very much slowed down. Frazier lasted longer against a smarter Foreman.
     
  4. Berlenbach

    Berlenbach Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,191
    1,251
    Sep 27, 2011
    You're forgetting that both men were also fighting differently to their usual tactics. Clancy had Foreman fighting at a more measured pace while Frazier was trying to box and survive. Regardless, it only delayed the inevitable.
     
    Turnip mk3 and Smoochie like this.
  5. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,030
    8,385
    Jul 17, 2009

    True. The Foreman of the Kingston bout would more than likely stop the '76 Frazier in ONE round.
     
  6. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    18,692
    19,826
    Jul 30, 2014
    Yes, but this was also a smarter Foreman. Frazier did what Lyle couldn't do in making it to the fifth round without being dropped.
    Also I'd like to ask you a question. Do you think a prime Frazier using these tactics would've beaten this Foreman?
     
    Azik likes this.
  7. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    18,692
    19,826
    Jul 30, 2014
    I disagree with this. Frazier fought a very good fight in 1976. Don't forget, Kingston Foreman had a lot less stamina. Notice, how after the first round, Foreman slumped into his corner.
     
  8. Berlenbach

    Berlenbach Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,191
    1,251
    Sep 27, 2011
    Thing is you talk about Frazier making it to round 5 as if that's a major accomplishment. He wasn't winning the fight, doing damage to Foreman or tiring him out. All Joe was really doing was delaying the inevitable. He wasn't close to winning. And look what happened in the fifth.

    No, I don't think a prime Frazier fighting that way against that Foreman would have beaten him for that simple reason Foreman, due to his size, strength and power would always be a huge problem for Frazier no matter when they fought or what styles they fought in. Every man has his bete noir, and Foreman happened to be Frazier's, just like Frazier was Ali's.
     
  9. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    18,692
    19,826
    Jul 30, 2014
    It was a major accomplishment, given the style match up, what happened in Jamaica, his condition at the time, and most importantly, he lasted longer than anyone else in Foreman's wins between Peralta II and Young, and the fact that he was also the only man between Foreman's wins between Peralta II and young, to answer the bell for round five, without having yet been dropped in the match.
    I agree. He only won one round.
    Foreman was definitely getting tired.
    Again, I agree.
    In 1976 Foreman was tiring after five rounds as was Frazier. If you replace that COMPLETELY SHOT Frazier with the one from 1971, instead of tiring, Joe will start smoking and getting better and better. He wouldn't gas. Foreman would gas even more, Ali barely worked Foreman's body yet he was exhausted by round eight. Frazier was one of the best body punchers. Foreman would be gassed by round five Imo.
    :rofl Based on what? The fact that he lost two out of their three fights despite being much closer to his prime? :lol::lol:
     
  10. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    18,692
    19,826
    Jul 30, 2014
    I honestly can't believe how much of you, are acting like Frazier's stamina would be irrelevant.
     
  11. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    216
    Feb 5, 2005
    It would be irrelevant because the fight wouldn't last long enough for it to become an issue. How hard is that to grasp???
     
  12. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    18,692
    19,826
    Jul 30, 2014
    Late 1968-1971 Frazier with 1976 tactics fighting 1976 Foreman. Foreman was already getting tired, by the end of their fight. So that alone, proves stamina would be an issue. Add to the fact that 1971 Frazier hit much harder, had much better body work, worlds faster (Foreman would have to step up his pace) better defense (He'd make Foreman miss much much more) and had a lot more stamina than his 1976 counterpart, then it's rather clear, that stamina would be an issue.

    This Frazier also threw more punches, and most importantly could time at range.
     
  13. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,746
    47
    May 22, 2015
    Frazier mounted 0 effective offense in either fight.
     
  14. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    18,692
    19,826
    Jul 30, 2014
    Couldn't be further from the truth.
     
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,336
    Jun 29, 2007
    Frazier would need a much better chin. He's losing 18-19 out of 20 times to a pre-Zaire Foreman.