You must have a 10-inch nose by now. Look -- You could not even exchange emails when I wanted to arrange things. You were scared. I said ring only ( Legalised battery there ). Then you lamely disappear for the board for three months, then appear back when I'm away from the board saying Airport. All facts. Then when I press you said you had a surgery? What type? I have asked may times. You say NOTHING. Might it have been for a new spine and pair of b@lls? Right, only a moron wants trouble in an airport. You are a shameful coward, a bigot, a liar. I'm glad you have 4 dogs, you seem like you need friends. Now, kindly tell us when you about to flame out ( you said you were not coming back to the board before, a lie ), and you might be surprised what I say. Have a good one Tony!
If there is any justice you will rot in hell for the lies you have told on this forum.I earnestly and sincerely hope you do not take to long arriving there.
You told us you saw Langford vs Hauge, then changed your story. You change your story quite a bit, often when called out. I called you out many times. I actually have fun with it, but not enough to go though your 1,000's of posts. Another time I laughed when you said you just returned from hunting from a short hunting trip and it was something like 2 AM in the UK. Shooting guns in the dark? Might I suggest you keep doing this? And who could forget the claimed IQ of 137 or 139, I forgot which level you said.
I'm glad you do. Hate isn't good. You have issues with others here. Go ahead and burn your own candle at both ends by all means. I think I spent enough time in this fake thread started by you. You always have to post last. Your that insecure. and angry I, however, can let it go knowing the fact and the truth. 20-1 you feel the need to reply again in this fake thread.
I said I had seen Langford v Hague many years ago my friend confirmed it is Langford v Lang.I then came on this forum and publicly said I was mistaken You still insist you have seen Langford v Hague. You haven't it has not been in existence for over 50 years. as Klompton has confirmed. I remember talking about that hunting night and H E Grant queried the late hour of it. I had been out lamping ,that is running a sight hound on game with the use of a powerful lamp to illuminate the quarry ,it is very popular among hunting dog enthusiasts in the UK and Australia.You can just as easily shoot game by the same lamp, mounted on a rifle ,and I've shot several thousand rabbits on farms over the years, using a rifle,[ 22 or 17,] at night out of my 4x4 as a means of pest control . I can't be held accountable or responsible for your ignorance of the subject. My IQ came up after you had mentioned it . not me .In my defence I said I had been tested twice ,once at 135 once at 137 no big deal ,my partner's is in the 140's .I said at the time and believe it today, it is an unreliable system of assessing intelligence and that I don't put much stock in it. However I would wager that all of my 4 dogs, [which you kindly mentioned in your other diatribe against me ,]would score significantly higher than you in such a test. I expect you are very pleased that the spotlight has moved from the scoring of the Jeffries v Corbett first fight ,a subject on which you have been comprehensively humiliated. GROUND HOG DAY?