Quigg is too big for frampton

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by TERRYTIBBS, Jan 8, 2016.


  1. On_The_Ropes

    On_The_Ropes Active Member Full Member

    946
    254
    Jan 3, 2016
    I like both fighters but as many other people have already said Frampton is the more skilful of the two & I expect him to win by late ko.
     
  2. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    AFAIK they have a morning-of the-fight weight check. This would be approx 10 hours before fight time. At this weigh-in both men cannot be more than 10 lbs above the division limit.
    Between this weigh in and first bell I think fighters can go ahead and put on more weight if they want.

    My point (for those saying Quigg is too big for Frampton) is that even IF it is physically possible for a man Quiggs size to gain more than a few pounds beyond the allowed 132 on fight morning, I doubt it would be healthy for him or benefit his performance - quite likely the opposite.
     
  3. I Shot JR

    I Shot JR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,621
    1,765
    Feb 17, 2012
    The winner has to face Rigo by July for the WBA belt and/or Wake for the IBF within 90 days. Which belt ultimately gets dropped?
     
  4. Could see Quigg fighting Rigo, no chance Can will. Once he's exposed the cash cow for Barry is over.
     
  5. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    with tyson furys recent scenario and now this...is it becoming near impossible to unify titles in the future ?...or will it push things to where belt holders will have to defend twice as much in a year in order to unify or keep belts they have unified?
     
  6. DON1

    DON1 ICEMAN Full Member

    5,221
    1,195
    Apr 6, 2006
  7. CathyBarry

    CathyBarry Active Member Full Member

    793
    597
    Jan 10, 2016
    No Quiggs lieing about his height even more than what Frampton is! I agree Frampton is about 5" 4 ish but Quigg is about 5" 6 and a half 5" 7 at the very most and that's being generous I feel! No way is that guy 5" 8! Even Wikipedia has Quigg as 5" 6.

    Check out the pics of him lined up with all the other boxers that train at that Khan gym in Bolton! He's like 2 inches shorter than Khan who's 5" 8ish, Quigg looks the same height as Stephen Smith who is listed 5" 6 and a half. 90% of celeb heights are bull**** anyway.

    And no way is Quigg too big, Framptons built like a tank for his size! I 'm thinking Frampton will win but not really confident.
     
  8. oiky

    oiky Gypsy Boy Full Member

    4,574
    1,617
    Jan 17, 2014
    Quigg is bigger, but hes getting busted. Team Frampton.
     
  9. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010

    I think your estimates are accurate.
    Frampton I would put at 5'4"-5'4.5
    Quigg 5'6.5"-5'7". :thumbsup
     
  10. FartWristedBum

    FartWristedBum I walk this Earth like a bum Full Member

    2,248
    600
    Feb 6, 2014
    If Framps turns up at least 85%+ fit and ready to go, he finds Quiggs chin and nose early. Too much natural skill and speed IMO.

    Can Scott do enough damage on the counter and prove Frampton is signigificantly shopworn? We'll see....

    Definitely not a 50-50 fight.
     
  11. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    'Shopworn'??? WTF??? :verysad
     
  12. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Frampton beats Quigg technically. He is more athletically inclined and a better boxer. However both of their mindsets suggest this fight will be more than athleticism and technique. It will involve the stuff we can't see - the heart, the strategy, the durability, the stamina etc. When that happens in professional boxing no one knows what will happen.
     
  13. davidmcallister

    davidmcallister Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    284
    Jun 15, 2011
    I have stood next to Khan and he is more like 5' 10''
     
  14. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    i was thinking about this earlier. stood next to him too. but honestly cant remember how tall he was. shoes can make a surprising difference to height though with various heel / sole sizes.
     
  15. davidmcallister

    davidmcallister Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    284
    Jun 15, 2011
    We were both wearing running style trainers and I am around 5' 11'' and he wasn't more than an inch smaller than me.