There is an article from 76 that describes him running with weights in his hands and ankles for miles. So not technically lifting weights in this instance but that is intense resistance training with weights that will grow muscles. He was also a huge proponent of soloflex which also is technically not weight lifting but is bodybuilding with resistance. Just saying, nobody in their late 20s just magically gains 20 pounds of muscle, Mandingo or not. Something changed.
Size did not enhance his footwork. Manny Steward improved his footwork. So yes his footwork was better and it was not his size that made his footwork better. Improving his footwork and gaining weight were not connected although both happened around the sa m e time. Now answer my question, why was it if the klits and Lennox got better with age as they put weight on, why didn't size advantage improve Jefferies, Louis and Liston in their comebacks? you don't think weight was not used to better advantage by Lewis and the Klit brothers compared to Mitch Green and Carl Williams? yes Baer and Carnera were exceptions the rule during an era where giants were usually at a disadvantage. Ultimately they lost to smaller men that outnumbered them within the ranks. So big men look better when they get bigger which they inarguably have? Big men have got bigger. This is both a fact and a deliberate trend. So yes I agree with this part. Look better, well this is a matter of opinion. Are we talking about the whole division of Superheavyweight or just the greatest SHW champions? Yes today they are harder to beat when they get bigger but there are conditions to this. The advantage has to work for rather than against them. And there is more in place than ever before to allow this. In this day and age size works for them. This did not used to be the case. You have pointed out Lewis and Klit got better as they got bigger but this coincides with the overall growth of the rest of the division and the natural slowing of pace. It coincides with their experience beginning to tell against for the most part less experienced equally slow challengers. They became better at maintaining an advantage. They were clever to dictate pace so that they could maintain distance. It appears today You can give away age if you can compensate with a size advantage. James Toney proved You can give away size if you have experience. Fury got the better of Wlad because he was not giving away size and he had enough 12 round experience so really he could match size and experience. But getting back to previous eras old champions could not compete with the next generation like Foreman, Holmes and Vitali did. In comebacks banking on size and experience Louis and Liston did not make the grade even though they worked through the ranks again like Foreman and Holmes did. Clearly something changed.
In this day of the Large heavyweights Lewis has many advantages but Marciano would bring late power and enough power to chin break Lewis
Because Jeffries was an absolute shell of a fighter who did not belong in the ring, Louis was past-prime, Liston was past-prime. They were not as good as they used to be. Weight (within reason) was not going to help or hamper them. Yes. But they did almost everything else better too. That's because they weren't very good at doing boxing. Athletically and fistically, they weren't very good. But, i'm beating my head against a brick wall here, i'm just explaining the same thing to you over and over and over again while you chase your tail in a circle. Please, please, please try to understand my posts before you reply to them. I am saying that in these specific cases, these fighters got better as they gained weight. And i've said, about six times now, that this is proof that your oft repeated theory that fighters who get bigger lose something - you've named 250-260 and "240 and 269" but in these cases, these fighters entering these weight brackets (269 aside) have improved, visibly, as gaining that weight. So you are wrong to say that fighters lose flair and skill as they get bigger. Yes, Wlad lost flair, but he also became better at doing boxing. Meanwhile, Lewis and Vitali both added flair and excellence as they got into the 240-252 brackets (between them). It is not the case because Willard, Carnera and Baer and their ilk did not have the potential to be equal to Lewis, Vitali and Wlad and Bowe under any circumstances. They didn't have that kind of potential. This is probably to be explained statistically. These fighters all have an athleticism and fighting heart that is likely to make them great. Buddy Baer, Willard and Carnera were all, at one time or another, harpooned for their lack of natural fighting ability, Baer especially was a disappointment in this regard. This is why increased population size is so important. You need the mental, physical and fistic aspects all to colluding before a fighter such as Bowe/Lewis could emerge. So I would expect to see that occur when population sizes reach a certain point allowing these very rare characteristics to combine. choklab, this has been explained to you about six, seven times now, and you have presented nothing, during post after post of thrashing and re-hashing to challenge any of it. What do you think that means? But they are excellent. You do mental gymnastics in order to avoid actually matching Vitali or Lewis with a 1930s heavyweight division or a 1960s heavyweight division, you work like an absolute ******* at it. They have to be tall but skinny, like Terrell, sh!t like that. It's absolutely wild. In the end, it's impossible to prove, but I find the notion that guys like 250lb Vitali Klitschko going back to 1954 HW division and not being extroardinary because "the pacing" is too fast for him absolutely ridiculous. These much smaller contenders can set whatever pace they like - they would tend to lose to these much bigger fighters. You honestly think otherwise? You HONESTLY think inside your brains that all you have to do to beat Lennox Lewis is be good and set a fast pace? But nobody in the world did that? It's incredible. Athletically gifted champions with brilliant boxing attributes and size emerged. It was inevitable and then it happened. That's the single most important thing that occurred. Did other stuff happen? Probably . Does it mean as much as you desperately want it to? No.
Marciano was NOT a proponent of SOLOFLEX. SOLOFLEX was a resistance exercise bench that used rubber bands rather than weights. SOLOFLEX is a relatively recent invention (80's as a guesstimate). Marciano practiced "dynamic tension" which was a regime developed by Charles Atlas. Dynamic tension involved using ones own body to produce resistance and also a series of calisthenics. As an example you would press down upon your wrist with one hand while performing a curling motion for bicep work. Etc.
Vital without roids having to train for 15 round fights would not weigh 250 pounds. Most all hwts today fighting in the 50s without roids having to train for 15 rounds would not look like they look today. The difference between fighting 12 vs 15 rounds can be significant. Not having performance enhancing substances means the fighter can't train as heavily and requires more time to recuperate in between workouts. Vitali, Wlad or most any of today's hwts would be much more "lanky" than today's versions.
This is true. Charles Atlas is an interesting character. He developed this system because he saw lions stretching out at the zoo, and thought that they were developing their muscles.
I admire your passion. I truly do. We both respect history but you have more faith in the future than I do. I wish I did. Things have changed. I wish I could see something good come from the evolution of Superheavyweight boxing. But I don't think it is progress. I thought true historic fans would rather boxing was decided on the art of boxing itself rather than size advantge. But I still believe the future of heavyweight boxing is in good hands with those like yourself that embrace all that is modern about it more than I do.
Charles Atlas was a good guy. Somebody into bodybuilding told me that Everything he stood for still actually stands up. Apparently his system worked.
I would go one step further and say a boxer like Johnson or anyone else going way past 15 rounds, would fight considerably different in terms of throwing combo's or anything else requiring a lot of energy, relative to those training for 12 rounds. It's almost not the same sport.
Sorry to join this conversation so late, but here is my two cents: On Norton lifting weights. Of course he did. He played football in college and he was a Marine. Take a look at the roundness of his biceps, etc. On Marciano: Rocky was a freak in the positive sense of the word. He only weighed about 190 but was as strong as a man 215. It has to do with something called muscle recruitment. We all vary in the percentage of muscle fibers are neuro system can active to do a given task. Some men can only active 20% of their muscle fibers while other luckier ones can activate 80%. This explains why two men the same age, height, and weight, both in good shape can vary in strength so much. Rocky was genetic standout in that he could activate a very high percentage of his muscle fibers, thus his amazing strength for a man his size. If Rocky were around today, with weight training and legal supplements such as protein powder, he would weigh a very hard 208 or so. And he would be as strong as a man 230. This of course would not increase his reach, etc. but anyone Rock hits goes down. I honestly don't thank that there is any evidence that the bigger a man gets, the better he takes a punch. Chuvalo was 6' and Wlad is about 6'5" and George takes a much better punch. That is my two cents.
Thats a different topic (fighting tactics v. training camp preparation) and I still only partly agree. I don't buy that guys only lunged, fell in behind single punches, and grappled instead of throwing crisp combinations and double jabs, etc. just to conserve energy.