the sites up now just let you pick dvds out of career sets... you can't cherry pick what fights you want on a dvd..... :crying
Well, there you go. Three professional judges all score basically the same and you have the exact opposite.
Not really. Szpilka's punches were not landing and Wilder was connecting with bigger shots from the 4th round on.
Why does it surprise anyone Wilder was up on the cards. Ive been telling you for years BOXING IS CORRUPT !!! Judges were Haymans lackeys no way they'd let him lose. three Morretti's there
Wilder's biggest problem is he just looks like a ko about to happen as he is so reckless. I was impressed with how he handled Fury but given the **** Dontay likes to talk he got what he deserved..
I never understood this line of thinking (and I'm not talking specific just to this fight). The "well AT LEAST ONE JUDGE" should score it differently. It's not like they look at each others' cards. They have no idea what the other two judges are scoring round three or five or any other round. How is it supposed to work? They get together after the round and say, 'Well it was close and we all thought Fighter A edged it, but someone has to bite the bullet and score it for Fighter B"???? Most of the butt hurt posters complaining about the score, including the OP, have an agenda. They make hate posts about Wilder pretty much every single day. So of course they're going to claim he lost all the close rounds. The fact is, a 120-108 fight can be competitive if all the rounds are close. Even if one guy wins all those rounds, if he does so by a close margin then it's a very competitive fight.