Eddie Hearn and Kell Brook Hiding Behind a Plastic IBF Belt

1. They are demanding 60:40 when Kell's financial clout does not warrant this.
For example, Khan got $1.5m for Algieri fight (same as what Danny Garcia got vs Guerrero).
Brook on the other hand got $200k vs Porter, and is only fighting small domestic fighters.

2. They are saying he deserves 40% because he's a 'champion', but this means very little. These ABC belts are none other than a toy belt from a cereal box, especially in a landscape full of live welterweights aka the top 10.

3. Kell Brook is busy fighting guys like Donut Dan, Frankie Antacid Gaviscon (Frankie Gavin) and Kev Showbiz (Kevin Bizier). Bigger fights would be accommodated for, but Eddie Hearn's business model entails winning a plastic belt and having his fighters face weaker opposition. When it's time for the big fight, Hearn has control of the judges scorecards.

4. Kell had a razor close fight with Shawn Porter. That is his claim to fame. Khan on the other hand:
W Maidana
W Judah (KO)
W Algieri (who beat Provodnikov, hello?)
W Alexander
W Peterson - Not counting the unfair point deduction
W Malignaggi of 2010



GET IN LINE, KELL. BY DEMANDING 60:40, YOU ARE DUCKING KHAN. KHAN HAS BIGGER FISH TO FRY AKA DANNY GARCIA REMATCH.

 

It's NOT a fair deal at all. I just REFUTED with FACTS why it's not a fair deal.

Brook doesn't really earn anything. $200k against a top fighter in Porter? :rofl

 

Go away. Kell is not worthy of 40%. There's one method of ducking, it's called financial ducking. Kell is guilty.

Khan would brutally KO Kell. Wake me up when Kell fights a big name. He needs to line up for the Khan sweepstakes.

 

Racist Khan hater logic: Why is Khan fighting Algieri, Algieri is a bum!

Kell fights Donut Dan, Frankie Gaviscon and Kev Showbiz: 'Good fights, might as well get mandatories out of the way'.

Kell earns $200k in his fights. Khan earns $1.5m: 'Kell is entitled to 40%'

GTFO.

 

atsch

1. Triangle theories much? Porter-Brook was a razor close fight, with a draw and even a Porter win being fair enough scorecards.

2a. Porter did not beat Devon worse than Khan did lol.
2b. Khan absolutely schooled Alexander.
2c. Equivocation with 'beat and hurt', it's too easy to see.

3. Collazo is an underrated fighter and a live threat. Same with Diaz. Diaz is a stylistic threat. Khan was learning under Virgil Hunter...a key thing guys who don't understand trainers, are unaware of.

4. Algieri is not an easy fight for Khan. Algieri had an even fight with Provodnikov, he proved his quality. Pacquiao is a Top ATG.

6. Agenda is further obvious - you know he's not Indian.

7. Brook is not 'skill wise' a level above Khan but I didn't expect a better judgement from you anyway.

8. Dan, Gavin and Bizier are domestic level. No one came close to stopping McCloskey either before Khan. Terrible argument.

8. You only support fighters you are ***ually attracted to (which you're very vocal about) or if they're Eastern European.

 

Your understanding of boxing is abysmal

anyway...:blood