tony tucker v david tua ? prime ?

What is so funny? I guarantee you that tons of posters agree with me... Tyson was better overall but shot for shot tua hits harder and was stronger

 

:good

 

Yes, but power on its own, is not worth two buckets of spit!

 

To be fair tua was a very good puncher, great finisher,explosive and very good hand speed for a man of his size. Good accuracy, he was more accurate than marciano for example. And he carried his power late.he had real 1 single ko punch, very few guys in history had the level of power of tua

 

But he always fell short, when he fought somebody in the top 10!

Let’s just go with Tucker on this!

 

He and Tucker beat about the same number of top ten fighters. Tucker wins this easily though.

 

yeah i picked tucker by decisión. But a ko by tua would not be rare

 

.................:rofl.................MIERDA! Your posts are made out of mierda.

 

i say tucker via dec / but tucker had fits with tiny non hard punching orlin norris so you just never know but if i was a betting man tucker via 12 rd dec

 

shot for shot? maybe tuas left hook is a bit more compact but his right hand is horrible and his jab is horrible

 

he lost to byrd and struggled badly with david izon and oleg masuev

 

And it proves what? Byrd was hard like hell to hit clean

 

His right han was horrible? For sure he was a 2 handed puncher with alot of power in both hands. He did not have a good jab... So what? Marciano and frazier neither did... They did not need it,they are brawlers inside not cute boxers

 

Wow.you must be 15 years old, i did think that it was the classic forum.
Be good today in the school sandra.
( forrest gum got better level of spanish than you)