Reevaluation of Vitali vs Wlad resume in light of Fury

Actually, by that standard, VK was lineal. That is a Ring generated standard (#1 ring ranked v #2), and #1 VK beat #2 Sanders, and was Ring champ. So, guess your even wrong on that totally inconsequential point.

 

They weren't number 1 and number 2. Like I said provide a source.

You can't. Sorry, but quitali is overrated and always will be

 

Too bad cw is irrelevant to this thread then, moron.

 

the ring isn't the lineal title. the ring is the ring title. are you really this dumb

 

Only in your warped little mind, nomyson.

 

http://www.cyberboxingzone.com/boxing/achamp.htm

 

http://www.cyberboxingzone.com/boxing/achamp.htm

 

Your stupidity is overwhelming. Think this through with me idiot. You say Wlad is lineal champ because of his win over Chagaev. Why is that? Because it was for the ring championship, no other reason. You have no rational way of giving lineal title to Wlad and not Vitali.

 

TKO6
Quit 9

What a champ

 

Like I said before, the ring title and the lineal title arent the same thing.
Nobody really respects the ring or its rankings. Only people who don't watch the sport do.

 

And now your journey through trolldom is complete. Congrats!

 

I agree. The question, then, is by what metric do you give the lineal title to Wlad and not Vitali. (Long pause). Oh, you didn't think that far, did you?

 

Whose trolling. I backed up everything I say.

get off quitali's nuts

 

because wlad ended up unifying all of the titles except the one he let vitali have. And also because nobody considers vitali the lineal champion who is of any concern.

how bout a poll

 

You've backed up exactly 0% of what you said. Answer my last question numbnts.