The Most 1 Dimensional Lineal Heavyweight Champion Ever?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by emallini, Feb 3, 2016.

  1. emallini

    emallini Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Messages:
    11,274
    Likes Received:
    2,540
    I think its Wlad.
     
  2. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Messages:
    14,883
    Likes Received:
    10,944
    id go for Hasim Rahman, Buster Douglas,primo canera, leon spinks,jess willard
     
  3. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2014
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    93
    Rocky Marciano. He didn't exactly jab and circle. Frazier too.
     
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    52,225
    Likes Received:
    27,733
    Foreman in his first career was pretty one dimensional. Rather incapable of adapting to an opponent who troubled him, but was very effective at what he did regardless.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,997
    Likes Received:
    28,008
    Ingemar Johansen.
     
  6. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2014
    Messages:
    10,928
    Likes Received:
    6,810
    Leon Spinks
     
  7. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2015
    Messages:
    5,103
    Likes Received:
    5,245
    Wlad must be up there
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,997
    Likes Received:
    28,008
    The truth is that none of them were particularly one dimensional.

    Building you game around a specific style, does not necessarily make you one dimensional.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    82,092
    Likes Received:
    22,238
    Wlad is the best example I can think of.

    An incredible dimension but one dimension none the less.

    Rocky is another one who had one dimension and was incredible at it.

    Corbett as well seemed to be one dimensional.

    Some of the great champs are one dimensional it has to be said, even if they were awesome at that dimension.
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,997
    Likes Received:
    28,008
    I would say that you are selling all three very far short.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    82,092
    Likes Received:
    22,238
    Maybe I just rate them higher than you do.
     
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    66,225
    Likes Received:
    53,696
    I would rate Burns, Willard, Carnera, Briggs and Rahman as all quite a bit more one-dimensional than Waldo... and of course none near as good.

    Wlad could certainly outpoint his opponents and when goaded into it deliver devastating power to take them out. If you are talking punch selection, he had an all time great jab and straight right and an underrated hook that he could work off the jab and which resulted in some of his more important knockdowns. He didn't uppercut a whole lot or go to the body, but Ali didn't go to the body a lot either. He also had excellent and extremely nimble footwork for a giant. I see a lot in his ****nal. Maybe if he gets back the title, then the old version of Wlad would be pretty limited.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    82,092
    Likes Received:
    22,238
    Burns and Willard are good shouts.

    Carnera is definitely not one dimensional, he had multiple dimensions that were all **** :lol:

    Briggs and Rahman both seemed to be able to brawl, fight behind a jab, and fight on the back foot, again though the werent very effective.

    One of the things that makes Wlad one dimensional is how good his dimension was, he never needed anything else combined with age, that reliance on controlling range ultimately cost him against Fury as he wasn't able to set himself and didn't have the ability t fight on the front foot and certainly didn't have the punch selection to attempt an inside assault.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,997
    Likes Received:
    28,008
    Burns?

    Hell no.

    Do you think that Burns would have got within sniffing distance of the title, with his stature and physical assets, if he had been anything other than an exceptionally complete fighter?
     
  15. WhyYouLittle

    WhyYouLittle Stand Still Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,372
    Likes Received:
    22
    Yeh Ingo's a good call IMO. Willard and Carnera too.