"Joe Calzaghe would beat prime Michael Spinks"- Max Kellerman

I think Max meant Cory Spinks.

 

Well he did slap like a little schoolgirl he was incapable of landing a good legal scoring punchatsch

 

Look at Kellermans background He has no boxing experience whatsoever not even as a kid. His Fathers $$$$$ & connections got him where he is not his boxing knowledge. You can take what he says with a pinch of salt lol

 

How much money did you lose betting on Hopkins?

 

yep betting on a 43 year old wasn't smart.

but he still nearly won, joe was that bad.

 

We have the reason for Berol's butthurt, live here in crystal clear HD :deal

 

Calzaghe was the real deal as proven time and time again.
Spinks was a good LHW, but Calzaghe was levels above and would have won easily

 

Betting on Jeff Lacy wasn't smart but you still did it :hi:

 

You're being sarcastic right? Lol

 

Aren't you the guy who said Broner is a future ATG and would destroy Maidana, Brook and Khan one after the other.

Your opinion holds no value. NONE.

 

how did I bet on him, I didn't know who he was until the fight was was screened in uni digs.

 

Not at all.
Calzaghe was a style that could alter and adapt to win, which is why he could not be beaten over 12 rounds, he found a way everytime

 

Thats right you just didnt know as per usual

 

So are you saying that he could beat Michael Spinks?

 

I believe he would have beaten Spinks. Styles make fights.
Remember how I wrote Fury would outpoint Wlad. It was a styles make fights thing