Gennady Golovkin Versus Keith Holmes at 160

GGG is a trilllllion-0 in hypothetical fights.

 

Any fighter that has to rely on a jab is tailor made for GGG.

 

I just don't like it when people claim that range and a good jab is the answer for everything. One of GGG's best assets is his ability to counter the jab.

 

king golovkin's great jab is in fact a counter jab.

 

Holmes was tall and Rangy, he had some pretty good skills to go with that size... But he wasn't a special fighter, so I dont see him beating GGG but I do see him troubling him a bit. GGG late stoppage

 

Absolutely.

 

Holmes was getting out hustled by Hacine Cherifi. Couldn't keep him behind his jab at all. How's he gonna keep an A level fighter like Golovkin at bay, who has excellent power, footwork, a great counter jab and a great ability to cut the ring, when he can't keep a journeyman like Cherifi off him?

GGG by late RTD or wide UD. Everyone voting Holmes obviously never saw the man fight, or they're just trying to talk **** on GGG (I'd say it's both)

 

Also very interesting that you don't know who Keith Holmes is.

And just think, "I'll say him because I don't know who GGG is"

 

thats what they all say ,,,then he kicks their ass and they are suddenly limited opposition :deal

 

Keith Holmes was managed by Don King's son Carl & was brought in as a late replacement for Woodhall to fight my Texas buddy Quincy Taylor for his WBG middleweight title. King promised tapes of Holmes they never showed. King & his hired gun ref Richard Steele robbed Quincy that night it was blatant.
Bernard Hopkins said to Quincy "" You got robbed man I doubt you'll get a rematch either, Bur don't worry I'll kick his ass for you & tell him that was for Quincy "" He kept his word too :happy

 

GGG would KO him.