How is that logical though, because there are four, why not five, why not three. We all know there should be just one. The IBO are not so far behind.
Yep, seems like they did. The Ring site has it vacant as well. Which seems totally legit, because he didn't fight a single Ring rated top 5 opponent over 2½ years after winning it.
Well you sort of answered that yourself. We all know there should be one. That is enough, so is 2 is stupid, 3 is ridiculous, 4 is absurd. 5 is...... just too many already. There are just too many belts.