When Exactly WAS a prime Tyson?? Who would beat Tyson in 1989?

As far as fighting the ATG's he'd lost to
Ali
Foreman
Holmes
Dempsey
Louis
Johnson
Holyfield and Lewis if they had fought earlier

 

Bruno is Bruno, youcant take away the mans mind and thoughts and claim he'd have better without it. Without fear he might never have pushed himself to train and fight.

again - its brunos biggest loss. its the polar opposite of tysons sign of weakness.

 

Bruno was a limited fighter, nothing like as mobile, energetic or varied in his punches as the Klitchkos and his record bears no comparison. That said, Mike was awful against him in 89. The lumbering Bruno caught him with a left amongst all his rabbit punches and Mike,who gave his worst display since outpointing Jim Smith, was wobbled. The second fight in 95, Bruno choked very badly. You look at that display and then see the one after it verses Holyfield it tells you prime Mike is a myth. When he stepped up to the real deal, an older man, he was clipped.

 

Are you ****ing stupid? Who gives a **** about other fighters when he's comparing Tyson to himself?

 

I think this is it right here, Wlado sucks!

 

You stand up for Tyson but you clown on Calzaghe? Calzaghe was 2x the fighter Tyson was.

 

Did Tyson struggle with Holyfield because he was a natural cruiserweight? kind of same stature,Tyson was great on the inside against big blokes well apart from the bonecrusher fight,just a thought.

 

No he was not, you're a bias brit.. no surprise there.

 

When he was destroyed by Lennox Lewis and Danny Williams. :deal

 

He was troubled and past it:deal.. What about Bruno?

 

Bruno was shot by that point. But he did nearly have Mike out of there early on.

 

They fought in the 80's too you know... or maybe you didnt!:deal

 

Yes and it was in the 80's when Bruno had him in trouble.

 

He had him in trouble in the second fight too... Next time be more specific that way we're on the same page.