Does Tyson run through Marcianos resume unbeaten ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by emallini, Mar 19, 2016.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,671
    27,383
    Feb 15, 2006
    I would respond to this with two questions:

    1. Why couldn’t he handle his power?
    2. What pressure?
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,671
    27,383
    Feb 15, 2006
    We have some fairly entrenched positions here, and neither side seems to be budging.

    It seems to come down to a fundamental disagreement, not about the respective merits of Marciano and Tyson, but of their respective opposition.
     
  3. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,588
    Jan 30, 2014
    Not exactly. The fundamental disagreement is that some of us view 1990-1991 Tyson as an explosive, dangerous, powerful 217-lb fighter who would have steamrolled over much smaller, older men. Others don't.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,671
    27,383
    Feb 15, 2006
    I guess it comes down to the fact that one camp values size, and the other favours results.
     
  5. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,588
    Jan 30, 2014
    Yeah, that must be it. Funny how you get quiet whenever anyone brings up Ezzard Charles' results though.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,671
    27,383
    Feb 15, 2006
    I will take his results over Douglas’s, any day of the week and twice on Sundays.
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,484
    47,666
    Feb 11, 2005
    Size, speed, balance, defense and variety of attack...
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    Because Tyson massively outweighs him with pure muscle, is one of the hardest punchers in boxing history and the most comparable matchup saw Charles stopped by Rocky and Tyson stopping Spinks.

    The physical pressure of having a 220 ripped power punching monster looking to take him out.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    I'd assume the camp favouring results wouldn't be harping on about Charles who was old, past his best and sporting a point five-oh record.
     
  10. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,237
    20,842
    Jul 30, 2014
    For all you guys saying Tyson goes undefeated, consider this: Tyson in his 49th fight had to come from behind to beat BOTHA, yet that very same version of Tyson is beating Archie Moore? Typical Tyson fanboy logic.
     
  11. Nighttrain

    Nighttrain 'BOUT IT 'BOUT IT Full Member

    5,292
    977
    Nov 7, 2011
    That was 10 years past his prlme.
     
  12. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,237
    20,842
    Jul 30, 2014
    That was his 49th fight. Just as Moore was Marciano's 49th fight. I think Moore, Walcott, and Louis, among others, would beat him.
     
  13. Nighttrain

    Nighttrain 'BOUT IT 'BOUT IT Full Member

    5,292
    977
    Nov 7, 2011
    Yeah, I think the question is premised on how a prime Tyson does against Marciano's resume. Granted one could point out that is not a luxury enjoyed by Marciano.
     
  14. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,538
    82,012
    Aug 21, 2012
    More or less my logic as well.

    Edit: I am agreeing with you. To be clear.
     
  15. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,538
    82,012
    Aug 21, 2012
    A prime Tyson likely does 49-0 as well. But that's an unfair question, not allowing for "off" nights and the wear and tear of an entire career.

    A Tyson over Marciano's career I think does drop a couple.