Lennox Lewis' physical strength and power

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jdw2000, Apr 2, 2016.


  1. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,588
    Apr 13, 2014
    Yes but as every Lewis fan who is worth his salt will let you know they were lucky punches...

    Of course I know he lost twice, but there was always an excuse by the fans.
     
  2. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,588
    Apr 13, 2014
    See this is what I'm referring to. IF Lewis had the style,size and power to beat Holyfield at any stage,why did he go 24 close rounds with a past it Holyfield?

    Also there were a few people who had Evander winning team second fight. So if a prime Lewis can just s****e by a Holyfield on the decline can you really see him being able to handle a prime Evander? Because I don't.
     
  3. jdw2000

    jdw2000 Active Member Full Member

    1,226
    39
    Oct 16, 2014
    McCall practiced the left hook, short right combination. It was Steward's gameplan from the start. McCall tried to land it in the 1st round but the right hand landed on Lewis' chest.

    Lewis was tiring against Rahman and looked to be running out of ideas. He was not controlling the fight, but was ahead on the cards. He took Rahman lightly - something he did not do in the rematch.
     
  4. jdw2000

    jdw2000 Active Member Full Member

    1,226
    39
    Oct 16, 2014
    I can see where you are going wrong, and it's quite a common mistake. You are assuming, indeed stating, that Holyfield was "past it" in 1999.

    You are wilfully ignoring the fact that Holyfield was the favourite against Lewis in the first fight. Ignoring that Holyfield was the recognised champion and 2/3 belts. Ignoring that "past-it" Holyfield was coming off the best wins of his career against Moorer and Tyson.

    But apart from that, yeah. Holy was shot. He was no better than the version Toney beat.
     
  5. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,588
    Apr 13, 2014
    And you are perpetuating what I said about alot of Lewis fans, very *****y and twisting what I actually said.

    At what point did I say Holyfield was shot? What I said was he was in decline. For example he wasn't the Holyfield of the early 90's and it is you who is being ignorant to this fact.

    Holyfield was favoured as the USA never regarded Lewis as being all that good and to say Tyson and Moore were his two best wins, I say you must be ignoring the victory over Bowe.
     
  6. jdw2000

    jdw2000 Active Member Full Member

    1,226
    39
    Oct 16, 2014
    I'm not going to be drawn into a semantics argument with you. You said Holyfield was "past it". Within the context we are discussing, that means something quite specific. It is tantamount to saying a fighter is shot, or is nearly shot. Now, if you want to retract that statement and apologise for it, then I will allow you to. Your choice.

    If you think that the first win over Tyson was not the best win of Holyfield's career, then you (as I guessed from the start) are probably 18 years old and certainly was not watching boxing 20 years ago. I was a hardcore fan back then. Had been a hardcore fan since 1992. I watched all of those fights and read all the magazines.

    The win over Bowe was fantastic. And is certainly in his top 4 wins. But it sure as hell is not #1. Bowe was fat, the fan man disrupted the fight, and his pregnant wife (Judy, iirc) was stretchered from ringside and taken to hospital after the fanman landed. And even then, enough people thought Bowe won that fight.


    The fact is that Holyfield, in decline or not, was in great form going into the Lewis fight. He was on home soil and was favourite to win. He was the recognised champion.

    Argue with facts all you want. You seem like the sort of idiot who when you have the moon pointed out to you will stare at the person's finger.
     
  7. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,588
    Apr 13, 2014
    So I'm an idiot because I don't agree with you that the Holyfield that beat Bowe was the same Holyfield that lost to Lewis?

    Ok I can live with that.

    Holyfield was past his prime, it was YOU whom said that I said he was shot...Again I never said this.

    Ok well take this into account in his next 3 fights Holyfield went 1-1-1 with Ruiz and was knocked down heavily off Ruiz, something Lewis couldn't do.

    Again this isn't prime Holyfield, but that doesn't fit with your pro Lewis agenda.

    I tell you what stick a poll up asking did Lewis beat a prime Holyfield and lets see the results.
     
  8. jdw2000

    jdw2000 Active Member Full Member

    1,226
    39
    Oct 16, 2014
    The best year of Holyfield's entire career, when his stock was at it's all-time highest, was 1997. In November 1997, when he unified the WBA and IBF titles by beating Moorer, Holyfield was at his zenith. You wouldn't know this because you probably hadn't been born yet.

    November 1997 was 1.5 years before he fought Lewis in New York in March 1999. It was 4 years after he narrowly beat a fat Rid**** Bowe.

    Holyfield was closer to his peak against Lewis than he was against Bowe.

    By the time Holyfield fought Lewis he was 5 years more experienced and canny. He had the confidence of having beaten Tyson, Moorer and Bowe.

    It was for all these reasons that he was favourite against Lewis in the first fight. And not, as you say, simply because the "Americans didn't rate Lewis".

    Your knowledge of boxing is acquired, tinted-glasses industrial BS. But I will not be too hard on you. It's good for boxing that people like you come onto these forums and chat with boxing fans. It will hopefully lead to you wanting to learn more about our sport and one day be a fan yourself.
     
  9. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,588
    Apr 13, 2014
    Again if you think the Holyfield of 99' is better than the Holyfield of 92/93 circa then the obviously is no debating you. This is seen with the condescending tone of your post.

    Who said Holyfield was peak in 97?

    If anything he looked awful against Czyz in 96 and was considered shot prior to his first fight against a Tyson who had been fed easy touches since his release. Then he beat a soft champion in Moorer avenging a loss then he looked average winning the decision against Vaughan Bean....he wasn't prime in 97.

    And again if he was prime or closer to his alleged prime, by your reckoning Ruiz beat a better Holyfield than Bowe.

    Oh and just before I go if you consider the Bowe of the Holyfield trilogy fat, then it's obviously you kind sir who needs to take those pro Lewis rose tinted glasses off.

    Again stick a poll up asking about Holyfield's prime. 92/93 or 97/99.
     
  10. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,889
    Apr 14, 2009
    Aww c'mon man that first Holyfield "draw" was a diabolical robbery. No one was more surprised than Vander when Eugenia Williams ludicrous card was read out giving Vander the dec Except maybe Lennox same as O'Conner the Brits "draw" card
    Lennox won both fights comfortably. Obviously yet another King inspired decision. Ms Willians STILL continued to judge but changed name to Gene Williams. Wonder why ????/
     
  11. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    786
    Aug 17, 2015
    The Holyfield of the Lewis fights did not have the workrate, agility and speed that he displayed in the Bowe fights. He was muscle-bound and couldn't fight the full 3 minutes anymore. A young 91 Holyfield would have been all over Lewis. Fighters that could maintain a quarter of the pace Holyfield could in the early 90s had Lewis huffing and puffing.
     
  12. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,272
    29,415
    Apr 4, 2005
    I'm a huge Lewis fan but the idea that 99 Holyfield was as good if not better than early 90's Holyfield is ludicrous.

    While I do think Holyfield did have a lot of success late in his career due to increased weight and the power that came with that, he wasn't better than the younger version of himself, he was more effective against certain styles being stronger and hitting harder but those improvements would not have worked against big heavies like Bowe or Lewis.

    So when Holyfield fought Lewis he was never going to be as effective as his younger self who may have been less strong and powerful but was quicker and more agile with better combinations. An early 90's Evander would have been a tougher proposition for Lewis.

    But I do think Lewis would always beat Evander. Holyfield even in his prime didn't have the style to handle Lewis. He lacked the power for a one shot KO, he speed, agility and combinations while making him a trickier opponent wouldn't have been enough as he would have always had to come to the bigger man and could never out jab and outbox Lewis like he did with Bowe in their 2nd fight. Lewis at his best dominated Evander in a way he never was before the clash of styles would always favour Lewis.
     
  13. jdw2000

    jdw2000 Active Member Full Member

    1,226
    39
    Oct 16, 2014
    Such as?

    And who did Holyfield beat with that style? Ancient Foreman and Holmes... Bert Cooper... a horrendously overweight Douglas... who else?

    Holyfield couldn't live with Bowe and Lewis. Good big men will beat good little men.

    If Holy had never fought Bowe you would all be saying how Bowe would have been outworked blah blah blah.

    Lewis beat Holyfield comfortably in 1999. And now it's: "had Holy been younger..."

    Lewis would have beaten him at any stage.
     
  14. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,588
    Apr 13, 2014
    I've never said I thought Lewis lost either fight. What I did say is there were people who had Holyfield edging their second fight.

    But what I am saying and stand by it is a prime Holyfield circa 92/93 beats any version of Lewis. This is not detracting from Lewis's greatness just that I think the bedt of Holyfield beats the best of Lewis.
     
  15. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Foh. Lewis has our respect. Like any champion when you lose, you have to prove yourself and Lewis did that tenfold. You aren't speaking for Americans clown. Your just throwing out a pathetic jealous opinion of us Americans. You could never speak for us.:nut