It's already been explained Azzer, remember ? Perhaps you're suffering from Azzheimers. Frazier's fight with Ali might have had a somewhat more detrimental effect on him than Tyson's torrid war with the GOAT HW Spinks. Among other things. I do like this thread though. A lot of laughs to be had on all sides. :good
What are you talking about? I never said Tokyo Tyson was the peak version. Fraizer suffered from physical breakdown and less stellar conditioning, Tyson mental issues/skill deterioration and conditioning.
I mentioned McNeely first, I think. McBride beat Tyson in 6 or 7 rounds. Yeah, maybe Frazier beats him in 3. I think Tyson might last 5 or 6 though, like Quarry did.
The only way Frazier is making it past round 3 is if Tyson and the referee helps Frazier back to his corner at the end of every round
Right. You use the word 'bum' just like the armchair athlete fools who've never competed. That puts you in their category. You're also agreeing with the trolls on this thread.
Only way Mike Tyson beats Joe Frazier is if there is a three knockdown rule in the fight. Otherwise Tyson gets dragged late, and stopped by Joe in the 13th round. Joe has too much toughness, determination, and experience to lose to Mike.
just 2 obssesed tyson fangirls would say that mcbride would last longer vs tyson than frazier would, so no, no ****ing body will agree with this bull****
Whatever. Most the great professional fighters we're talking about on these threads have used the term "bums" too. And worse terms. If you've honestly never ever used the term, good for you. You're in a very small minority of boxing fans and insiders, and you can commend yourself and carry on being self-righteous with justication. I salute you.:good
Most knowledgeable boxing fans don't believe it. But if you include everyone, all the kinda of people who think Steven Seagal would flying roundhouse kick Tyson's head off ....