Margarito* vs Mayorga. Who's Greater?

This guy gets it:deal

Mayorga was just a wild sloppy fighter who liked to swing for the fences. The only reason Forrest(Mayorga's only noteworthy victory) lost to him was because he could not figure out his awkward style.

Mayorga would have been demolished by the constant pressure of the iron-chinned Tornado.:deal

 

This.

 

What a douche

He just gave you some good reasons why he thinks Margarito would win
and you stubbornly just brushed them aside.

Why would anyone waste an honest opinion on your joke repliespp

 

This. I don't think Mayorga was even right for the Tito fight. Something was off with him and didn't do too bad even, but I swear when he let Tito tee off twice on him the second punch hurt him and those impacted the fight more than it looked.

 

Mayorga. And it's not really close imo.

Plus Mayorga is the only man I've ever seen take 6 flush shots square in the face and still win the exchange.

 

A single, perhaps-tainted win over Cotto is better than prime Forrest x2? No.

 

Margaret isn't miles better than anyone.
And the term great has no place anywhere near marg unless it's references to him taking a great one sided ass beating

 

Mayorga > Margarita

 

Margarito used plaster and couldnt take a boxer with suspect chin out til the 11th. Ueah right, people who accuse Margarito of cheating need to look up the Luis Resto case so they can see what using plaster leads to. That being said they both rank about the same with the difference being Mayorga fought in an era with fighters like ODLH and Tito so I would rank him higher

 

4???
what are your other 2???

 

there are pictures of the hardened, bloodied pads confiscated as evidence.
thomas houser has a lengthy article about the story unfolding
how about YOU get hit with bricks by a professional boxer for 11 rounds see if you dont get destroyed
margarito cheated
he is the most hated man in boxing
i use the word "man" with spite.
he is more hated than don king ever was..

 

That has been the case from day one when Nazim Richardson uttered the lie of a lifetime " I saw plaster blocks fall from Margarito's wraps' What happened to those "BLOCKS" ?? No one else saw any "BLOCKS" All that was found was a used gauze pad with a brown stain on it. This pad was deemed HARMLESS
by that lab that tested it
From this blatant lie sprang the undeserved "cheato" accusations. Ive asked Richardson, the CSAC etc to show me one iota of PROOF that Antonio Margarito EVER cheated or ever
TRIED to cheat , No one could no one can all anyone has are baseless ACCUSATIONS!!!
Even you IB did it by putting " A single PERHAPS TAINTED win" Have you ever put ' Mayweathers PERHAPS TAINTED win over Manny Paquaio" ??? No but be honest there is more evidence of probable cheating in that case scenario than disappearing plaster blocksatschatsch

 

That pad was NEVER hard It was a damp used pad with a brown stain on it The stain was NEVER proven to be blood
The pads were deemed HARMLESS!! by the lab doing the testing . The most suspicious thing\g was when Margarito's rep asked the CSAC rp if they could see the pads. The rep stuttered & stammered "" Err Err We cannot we have MISLAID the pads we do not have them any more" atschatsch How convenient Huh ??//
I Rest My Case