Tyson was coming off a 2 year layoff prior to the Botha fight. Botha was put to sleep with the first solid shot Tyson landed.
... and it took Tyson 5 rounds to land a solid shot against a guy that's not particularly hard to hit :hey
Point is that Damiani was a big guy with skills and a chin and Tyson had looked less than invincible against similar opposition. Damiani said that he could have been in Tokyo vs Tyson instead of Douglas, and frankly I think that he could have put up an excellent fight there as well. Props to Douglas, he was on fire that night, but overall, Damiani > Douglas.
Botha fought a shell of Tyson in 1999. Damiani came from the 1980's early 90's. He would have met a much better Tyson than the one of 1999. damiani was better than Kevin Macbride , but what relevance is that? Rudduck Tyson and every version prior knocks damiani out.