Canelo Says He Wants To Fight Golovkin, But He's Not Sure When...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Sharkeisha, Apr 19, 2016.


Page 1 of 3
  1. Sharkeisha

    Sharkeisha Guest

    "It's in my future plans. It's definitely in my future plans. I want to have that fight. I want to give that to the fans. I'm just not sure when."

    :-(

    Uhhh, did Canelo magically forget that he has to fight Golovkin next or he's going to lose the belt?

    :huh
     
    Sharkeisha, Apr 19, 2016
    Sharkeisha, Apr 19, 2016
    #1
  2. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,517
    15,932
    Jul 19, 2004
    I wouldn't be so sure that he's losing that belt. The WBC seems to consistently give Canelo and Oscar their blessing, and I'd be surprised if that changed any time soon.

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Apr 19, 2016
    Rumsfeld, Apr 19, 2016
    #2
  3. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    Literally every response.

    "It will happen. Of course it will happen. We want it to happy. It'll happen, don't worry. This fight must happen. We want that fight. We want to give the fans that fight. We will give the fans that fight.... but we just don't know when or what the future holds."
     
    abuffy, Apr 19, 2016
    abuffy, Apr 19, 2016
    #3
  4. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    9,468
    376
    Feb 10, 2009
    Canelo is dropping that belt with the quickness. Then, his team will say GGG "ducked" them for refusing to fight at 155lbs with a 30% cut.
     
    Henke67, Apr 19, 2016
    Henke67, Apr 19, 2016
    #4
  5. Reg

    Reg Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,373
    6,926
    Feb 5, 2016
    Thats only happened once though. It was the consensus thought that WBC gave Canelo a free voluntary because he just fought the Lineal champ and deserved a tune up before GOlovkin.

    Anytime people talk about this subject they act like Cotto and Canelo are the same person and that the WBC has gave that conjoined person multiple passes when that isn't the case. Cotto got one and Canelo got his one. We haven't seen what the WBC would do after that point because Cotto lost against his free voluntary.
     
    Reg, Apr 19, 2016
    Reg, Apr 19, 2016
    #5
  6. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,120
    2,760
    Jul 20, 2004
    Probably when Golovkin and his team finally decide to stop munching on handpicked tomato cans.
     
    Scar, Apr 19, 2016
    Scar, Apr 19, 2016
    #6
  7. Leoh

    Leoh Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,749
    1,239
    Dec 19, 2014
    I don't know what the legal framework is when it comes to sanctioning bodies but if WBC doesn't strip Canelo after Khan for not fighting GGG, then K2 should sue WBC and ask the court to forbid them to sanction any event in the US until the matter is resolved. That's the kind of thing WBC needs.
     
    Leoh, Apr 19, 2016
    Leoh, Apr 19, 2016
    #7
  8. Willie Maeket

    Willie Maeket "40 Acres and Mule" -General William T. Sherman Full Member

    13,893
    8,367
    Jun 22, 2015
    Lets just look at the WBC's history of "GIVING" popular Mexicans WBC title shots even if they are not in the rankings.
    Chavez Jr. comes to mind.:think
     
    Willie Maeket, Apr 19, 2016
    Willie Maeket, Apr 19, 2016
    #8
  9. Stallion

    Stallion Son of Rome Full Member

    5,561
    347
    May 6, 2013
    Don't let the perception fool you, you are forgetting 2 things. :)

    1) Always remember that everyone watches over their own skin first.

    2) WBC have been granting those exceptions with K2 blessing.

    I predict that WBC ultimately strips Canelo (or makes him a champ in recess/emeritus or something) if Golovkin activates his mandatory position later this year. :cool:
     
    Stallion, Apr 19, 2016
    Stallion, Apr 19, 2016
    #9
  10. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    Canelo is like a virgin on a date with a horny man. She knows she is gonna get ****ed, so she keeps trying to postpone it.
     
    Peril, Apr 19, 2016
    Peril, Apr 19, 2016
    #10
  11. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,517
    15,932
    Jul 19, 2004
    Point #2 is a good one indeed. But all the same, you seem to have more faith in the WBC than I do. I think they'll follow the money, and if there's any chance of Canelo-Pacquiao or Mayweather-Canelo II, or even Canelo-Cotto II - I can't see them forcing the issue, especially since they are long known to make up the rules as they move along.

    Time will tell. But I believe the WBC and Golden Boy have a symbiotic relationship of sorts. And I don't think Golovkin has the muscle to break the bonds of that pairing.

    But maybe that's just me.

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Apr 19, 2016
    Rumsfeld, Apr 19, 2016
    #11
  12. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    In that case, it will be time for another devastating lawsuit. thankfully, the blueprint for bankrupting wbc is already there, as well as the precedent.
     
    Peril, Apr 19, 2016
    Peril, Apr 19, 2016
    #12
  13. Doc Everlast

    Doc Everlast Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,371
    10
    Aug 23, 2013
    Bring a baseball bat.
     
    Doc Everlast, Apr 19, 2016
    Doc Everlast, Apr 19, 2016
    #13
  14. Doc Everlast

    Doc Everlast Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,371
    10
    Aug 23, 2013
    Rotten tomatoes! :hey
     
    Doc Everlast, Apr 19, 2016
    Doc Everlast, Apr 19, 2016
    #14
  15. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,890
    Apr 14, 2009
    lol boxing isn't corrupt is it Rummy. pollo wants no part of GGG :smoke
     
    C.J., Apr 19, 2016
    C.J., Apr 19, 2016
    #15
Page 1 of 3