In order for someone like pac to ever compete with srr or Henry Armstrong as a goat

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Madmink, Apr 16, 2016.


  1. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,832
    10,211
    Mar 7, 2012
    You're a stat guy like so many others on here.

    It's just pure ignorance to think that the fighters of the past with losing records were no hopers.
     
  2. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,832
    10,211
    Mar 7, 2012
    Why wouldn't it be possible for Ray to have beaten Manny or Floyd?

    What's the thinking behind this?
     
  3. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,832
    10,211
    Mar 7, 2012
    Any knowledgeable fan of boxing would know the following things:

    There's fighters of today who would have been able to have beaten fighters from decades ago.

    There's fighters from decades ago who would have been able to have beaten fighters of today.

    Boxing does not progress each decade in the same way that some other sports have.
     
  4. cslb

    cslb Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,614
    9,825
    Jan 27, 2014
    They wouldn't have fought him. Simple as that.
     
  5. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,832
    10,211
    Mar 7, 2012
    :good
     
  6. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,832
    10,211
    Mar 7, 2012
    :good
     
  7. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,832
    10,211
    Mar 7, 2012
    Boxrec is useful. But don't ever use it to gauge someone's worth without knowing anything about them.

    Statistics don't allow for circumstances.

    If you had a time machine and you dropped Floyd Mayweather off in the 40's for a 10-15 year period, it'd be highly unlikely that he'd still have been unbeaten when you'd picked him back up.
     
  8. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,141
    Jun 23, 2005
    He would have to stop going life and death with JMM for 4 fights.:deal
     
  9. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,832
    10,211
    Mar 7, 2012
    It works both ways.

    The fighters of yesteryear did not have the advantages of sports science and luxury training facilities and equipment. But they had better competition, more fights, and ATG trainers to learn from etc.

    There is no logical reason why Ray Robinson couldn't clear out today's WW division if you transported him in a time machine.

    Sports science has nothing to do with a fighters skilset.
     
  10. attaboi

    attaboi Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,143
    12
    Feb 19, 2012
    Pac beat a washed up Mosley.
     
  11. Madmink

    Madmink Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,620
    284
    Apr 11, 2016
    Instead go life and death with la motto for 5.a limited slugger who is stratospheres behind marquez in skill and talent and well pretty much everything apart from maybe the chin dept
     
  12. deltrotter

    deltrotter Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,659
    553
    Jun 8, 2013
    Its pretty simple NO one can compare the ATGs of yesteryear to todays. And what I said stands.
    People seem to think that a SRR from what they know and have seen would beat the WW ATG of today. Its not possible, they are basing it off the past. The now, if he had been born 1990 who knows? No ONE
    But again what they are basing it on is PAST and the changes in the sport have pushed it to a different level.
    If you were talking 20 or so years ago then maybe but we are talking DECADES more.
    And you want to know what the worst part is, you cant prove I'm wrong.
     
  13. Madmink

    Madmink Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,620
    284
    Apr 11, 2016
    They can prove your wrong,they've got numerous Bert sugar interviews.here we're talking about a man with no bias at all who witnessed both first hand.not only would srr simply breeze through today's fighters,even suggesting they go anywhere near the distance is implausible.
    Bert sugar also states jack dempsey is the greatest hw of all time and the biggest puncher,who are we to disagree,foreman Lewis tyson klitschko and company just look better in colour I guess,the way he destroyed the great jess willard.....oh wait a minute he was big and that's were it ended,pudding would describe him better.
    Bert sugar was also a failed basketball pundit before he was a boxing an alyst,says a lot really
     
  14. deltrotter

    deltrotter Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,659
    553
    Jun 8, 2013

    Thats opinion and like I said impossible to prove. So people talking about it wont get anywhere.
    Facts are that through history records are broken and this happens mostly because of science.
    I am not suggesting SRR is ranked anywhere other than at the top of the tree. But if you or anyone else here is trying to tell me a fighter with a few weeks training, and such his opponent. Are as elite as they are today with way more rest and training you are having a laugh.
     
  15. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,266
    15,086
    Dec 6, 2008
    I respect Pac and most foreign fighters compared to American fighters because they have to fight mostly away from home. Americans mostly always fight at home. I don't care what anyone says, statistics prove in most sports that being home or away matters.