Anyone that scored Jack-Bute less than a win for Jack have no sense of fairness.

I'd like to add that I dont dislike CST80.
but me and him disagree with almost everything.
but this fight was damn close.
if it was 115-113 x 3 for jack I'd have no issue.
the UK broadcast had the score close too. showtime **** the bed.
I'm assuming the people who had it 8-2 or 7-3 didnt score the fight round by round

 

I'm no fan of Bute, but Jack wasn't dominant at all no matter how the commentators tried to spin it.

 

I think I only gave Bute 3 or 4 rounds. I totally forgot, but he did win the last 2 rounds. Jack won very clearly. In my opinion, it wasn't close at all. Robbery by any means, and I'm no TMT fanatic or anything.

I just think Jack won that match fair and square. Funny thing is the DeGale/Medina fight was closer than Jack/Bute, and he got those crazy scorecards.

 

A draw was fair. It was a close fight.

 

Give it a rest. We knew that Jack has a glass jaw, but now all questions were answer. Jack is a bum, you should thank Bute for exposing the fraud

 

Bute won at least 5 rounds after watching again the fight. Previously I thought that about 4. Watching some slow motions, I'm not even convinced Jack won the bout. Some of his "points" had no power at all. The draw might have been fair in the end.

 

He's Floyd's boy, it's Showtime and Floyd was there. Plus the whole night was a set-up for DeGale-Jack unification.

And lets be honest about it, you're backing the European Gambian-Swede because he's TMT, not for any other reason. He shat all over your useless lame barking American champ Dirrell (how I laffed).

I thought the fight was close, Jack possibly edged it but if it had gone the other way, I don't think the outcry should have been big, a draw wasn't outrageous either.

I wanted Jack to win, because DeGale will beat him in the unification. Hopefully in London.