Earnie Shavers vs. Sam Peter

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Vince Voltage, May 15, 2016.


  1. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,685
    87,661
    Aug 21, 2012
    Bob Starlings eh? :huh Dino trips and falls down the stairs again :lol:

    Shavers was a midget compared to Peter. P4P he may have been better but there's lots of pounds between a blown up cruiserweight and an actual heavyweight :yep
     
  2. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    shavers faced 2 of top three atg hw champs ever.

    kliturd self destructs once again.

    but why you wanna self destruct so horribly bad? I'm curious.
     
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,685
    87,661
    Aug 21, 2012
    I'm arguing with two idiots.

    You keep out of it ;)
     
  4. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,685
    87,661
    Aug 21, 2012

    Aaaaannnnddd ... HERE we have the actual reason why Herol and Dino are so adamant that Shavers would obliterate Peter :lol:

    It's the "Klitschko factor" yet again :deal

    The hate never ends :rofl
     
  5. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    63,390
    26,928
    Jul 21, 2012
    No, Toney was and he beat Peter but was horribly robbed of the decision.

    Shavers had two inches on Toney.

    Shavers was better than Chambers.
     
  6. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    63,390
    26,928
    Jul 21, 2012
    Same can be said for you by picking Peters.

    Any reasonable , objective fan like me can clearly see that Shavers was better than Peter by about 10 levels.
     
  7. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,685
    87,661
    Aug 21, 2012
    Your fellow Klithater fessed up. Do the right thing Dino and tell us why you REALLY think Shavers would supposedly beat Peter easily :deal
     
  8. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    63,390
    26,928
    Jul 21, 2012
    Ok.
     
  9. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,685
    87,661
    Aug 21, 2012
    Except for a lot of others give Peter the edge too. It is far from being an unreasonable choice.

    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

    *wipes tears from eyes*

    1) I admit Shavers was somewhat better than Sam. I already pointed out Sam's shortcomings.

    2) You don't want to look at Shaver's flop performances and shortcomings and face up to the fact that he is WELL within the range of somebody like Peter to obliterate. Especially given Shavers' so-so chin and much smaller size.
     
  10. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    so.. let me get your logic straight............. we picked shavers.............. because YOU as a kliturd are destroying your own arguments??

    HAHAHAHA
     
  11. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    I'm pretty sure these two would pick Jack O'Halloran over Peter.

    Nevermind the fact they never saw him fight. He certainly looked menacing, especially in Superman II.
     
  12. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,032
    Sep 22, 2010
    run away and hide behind ur friend np your time is over here.
     
  13. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,249
    5,941
    Apr 30, 2006

    Have mercy man, you're killing me here :lol::lol::lol::lol:

    James Toney would lose to Shavers now? Bob Starlings? :rofl:rofl
     
  14. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,249
    5,941
    Apr 30, 2006
    Other sound favorites over Peter include Sam Langforth, Jack Dempsley, Buzzard Charles, and Gary, Indiana Joe Wolcott
     
  15. turnip

    turnip Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,115
    39
    Oct 19, 2015
    Peter was slow and easy to hit with a poor jab.shavers would hit him with no problem.prehaps Peter could take the shots of one of the hardest hitting HWs in history then he would win with ease.anyone Ernie could hit was in trouble .Peter got hit a lot.