Golovkin has many good options to fight next

good.. I hope all your dreams come true

 

Canelo
Saunders
Jacobs
Cotto
Lara
Charlo

 

cotto, lara and charlo?!?!?! nope....those guys need to get ranked at 160 in order to get a shot...become a mandatory!

 

Why?

 

i dont really know why...im just going off of what lil gs superfans are saying

"if lara wants a shot tell him to fight jacobs and become a mandatory"..i didnt say this just telling u what im reading from the lil g excuse makers

 

I'm not really a fan of boxers. More a fan of the sport.

Lara is willing to face Golovkin and is better than anyone he's beaten to date.

Behind the other 3 belt holders and Cotto he's the best option imo.

 

I think all 3 are easy wins. They'll just be 3 more bums once GGG shows how many levels above them he is.

 

Because GGG doesn't need to pull up "smaller" guys who have no right to fight him.

(Yes I know most of them are bigger, but the same people who give Alvarez credit for fighting Khan would be all over GGG for fighting a JMW)

I think if a JMW wants to fight GGG they should prove themselves at middleweight by getting ranked. Or at least clean out 154 so we can have undisputed champ vs undisputed champ.

 

if he had fought ward and beaten him, ward suddenly would have been shot. these guys will spout the same ****, no matter what.

 

No offense bro but you should fully think about your premise guys one weight apart is no big deal and if your division sucks you get more credit than for subteir wins regardless of weight.

I mean seriously Thurman vs Berto or Thurman vs Crawford does Crawford really have to earn a shot over Berto or is Thurman-Berto a more legit win.

GGG gets more credit beating Lara,Charlo than he does Lemiuex,Wade.

 

Never really know I thought he'd try to outbox Quillin and he lit him up a couple seconds after the fight started, I know he'd get knocked out trying that against Golovkin could be some scary moments though.

 

Agree about Wade, but Lemiuex is a legit win. Charlo moving up would not be considered a good win...both of them are unproven and to be honest, they don't even appear that good.

Crawford can go up and fight whoever he wants because he'll be the undisputed man at his division if he beats Postol. Plus he's an unbeaten multiweight champ.

Lara has been beaten, his limitations are well-known, and he's not the man at his division.

 

Is this the kind of things that go on in your deluded mind? Because I'm 100% certain if Golovkin beat Ward, he'd get all the credit in the world for it. Stop spouting nonsense.