Maybe, idk. 135lb Mosley was a beast, but his failure to achieve the success of what ATG (like Pac and Floyd) do at higher weight classes counts against him. So although I may favor him slightly at 135lb against Pac, I wouldn't be surprised if he lost.
Id go with Mosley, just like id also favor a primeOscar. Those two guys in their primehad speed and power and the deciding factor would probably be that they are naturally bigger
Mosley was faster, better coordinated, stronger and far sturdier at 135 than Pac's incarnation at 135.
Pacquiao was past prime in the Mosley fight. Pacquiao is drastically undersized and less effective at 147.
Even if he's faster, bigger and stronger at 135 pounds he still may lose. Pacquiao in his prime was an attrition fighter. Can Mosley handle 1000 power shots coming from all angles with the same intensity for all 12 rounds?
Mosley was before Pacquiaos time. Fight could have never happened prime for prime. The last thing Pacquiao would ever be is afraid. He took on Margarito one of the biggest abd toughest Welterweights of all time.
u posed the question "prime for prime at 135" you idiot...I answered it pac didn't want the old version of shane that whooped margarita...he was afraid roach said it would have to be at a catchweight because "yer not Oscar"...they ducked old shane and only fought him later after they knew he was shot cause Floyd whitewashed him
Could a prime undefeated 135 pound Mosley deal with the work rate and speed of Pacquaio? I think it goes both ways as Shane was a dynamo at 135 pounds. He had it all, speed, power, reflexes and most importantly in this hypothetical fight 'SIZE'. Mosley would beat Pacquaio at any weight!:deal
You can't read. Prime Mosley was late 90s and early 2000s. How the **** is Pac supposed to fight then when he's at 112 and 122 pounds? For ****s sake man, Jesus.
Yes Mosley at 135 was bigger, stronger and faster. But Pacquiao could weather the early storm then use his much superior stamina and angles to punish Mosley late.