Who Was The Most Complete Fighter At the Original 8 Weights?

Which single boxer was the most complete fighter in the original 8 weights?
As in my selections:

Hvy Joe Louis
LHvy Ezzard Charles
M Ray Robinson
W Ray Robinson
L Benny Leonard
F ?????????
B Eder Jofre
Fly Benny Lynch

I don't mean the one who would necessarily win,if pitted against the others.I mean the one who,had the most complete set of skills ie.
Power
Boxing ability
Defence
Punch variety
Chin
Etc

For example I pick Ali,Johnson ,and Dempsey to beat Louis.
It's a bit different to P4P where I pick Harry Greb as number one and also at middleweight.
Thoughts?

 

In terms of completeness Sugar Ray Robinson blows everyone else out of the water. Any situation and he could adapt. Lamotta is the only fighter to truly pose problems for Robinson.

 

Thank you and I agree, but I'm looking for 8 ,as in one in each original division.

 

Leonard (147) and Hagler (160) each deserve at least honorable mention.

 

If they are your choices they do,But I'm looking for one in each division.

 

My list, with all new names:
Holmes
Spinks
Hagler
SRL
Whitaker
Sanchez
?

 

Greetings DagoWop!
Not really, Ray lost a decision to Lamotta early in his career giving away a lot of pounds, then, basically ran the table on him 2-3 weeks later? My gosh, 14-21 days later??? Let the modern boys ponder 12 fights a year for 12 years.
Ray always said "I can always beat Jake, I just have to show up in shape"
It's a shame that there still aren't only 8 weight classes (OK, add Cruiser to the list) with ONE sanctioned body.

 

I'd have trouble with the inclusion of Whitaker in this group. He was a defensive specialist and probably a bit lacking in firepower to earn the label "most complete" at a given weight.

 

Each fight was competitive the way I saw it. Lamotta knocked down Ray a couple times while Ray knocked down Lamotta 0 times.

 

Oh...my bad lol

HW - Joe Louis
LHW - Ezzard Charles
MW - Marvin Hagler
WW - Ray Robinson
LW - Benny Leonard

 

Yeah, that's a fair point. Hector Camacho isn't as great but he probably would have been a better nod.

 

At lightweight, I've never seen a more complete fighter than Duran - and it's not close. And frankly, I've never seen a more complete fighter than Duran at any weight. I think his machismo and "hands of stone" persona really over-shadowed what a technical virtuoso he was.

 

I'd have Sanchez at featherweight.

 

Duran's up there. Possibly the greatest lightweight of all time. That being said, I consider Camacho to be more "complete" because of his footwork and mobility.

 

Camacho had the quicker feet and hands, but I think Duran's overall boxing skill was superior. But Camacho is a good choice. He's a guy whose "image" kind of overshadowed his actual substance. Before Rosario shook him and his future grandchildren, he was a versatile and complete fighter.