BREAKING NEWS Povetkin's B sample positive

According to Genesis, the world was created in less time than it has taken the WBC to make a simple ruling -- clean, clean, clean, dirty = guilty.

 

Good article over the at the scene about this. Ryabinsky claims an investigation will take 2 months. So I agree Wilder should be allowed to fight in the interim. However the article goes in depth how this stuff is sold over the counter with no prescription necessary. And how Povetkin's test results were 0.07 micrograms below the level Wada said was ok on tests taken by March 1st. Anyway check it out. To me, it seems to be a flimsy way to cancel a fight. This medicine shouldn't even be banned in my estimation but rules are rules. I hope the bout is re-scheduled. This is nothing like the stuff guys like Toney and Tarver were popped for.

 

Either quote me or my post. Otherwise, I won't be able to keep slapping you around on here. It's not strictly banned. There are exceptions and that's what a TUE is for. Now MELODIUM is strictly banned. See the difference?

Didn't ODLH use an IV right before the Pacquiao fight? Of course they weren't testing by WADA code (no surprise there) . But, the point is IV use is not strictly banned. Atheletes can utilize it under certain exceptions.



Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

 

Don't waste your time on this. These jokers have a profound prejudice interfering with their judgement.

 

Don't waste your time on this. These jokers have a profound prejudice and perhaps disability interfering with their judgement.

 

What's keep Vada/Wada from tampering the samples? Who owns them? Void can do anything he wants, they want to destroy the fighters they don't like. Who pays them?

 

1 yr ban

 

:good

 

There are no exceptions to administering an IV in your own home. To get a TUE, you have to apply for one ahead of time. And if you actually read the Code, you don't have to be a donkey to realize that if you had a valid reason to have an IV, you'd be in the hospital anyways.

Flos always seem to come back to DLH and his IV use. Hello morans, IV use is legal under NSAC. However it is not legal under WADA. This brings us full circle to the anti-doping contract. If you actually ****ing read Hauser's article, you'd know they worded the contract in a way to basically mean USADA could issue a never-before issued retroactive TUE.

HELLO WHY THE **** DID THEY KNOW THEY NEEDED TO ISSUE A ****ING RETRO-ACTIVE TUE?

Why was the contract written so they could basically ignore the WADA Code. If you go to USADA's site, they state with no confusion that they are an agency that follows the WORLD ANTI DOPING AGENCY, and yet they broke all WADA rules.

Don't bother replying cuz I know you'll just comeback with some stupid distraction.

 

You are dense sir. IV use is not strictly banned as you said. The TUE was approved by all parties involved. You want to read between the lines. But, the facts don't change. Case is CLOSED dumb dumb.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

 

You sound just like the now extinct legion of Lance Armstrong fanboys. atsch

 

Lol...you sound desperate and grasping at straws to try and justify your obvious agenda.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

 

GO back and answer the questions then? You're a fool to even try to debate facts. All you flos are the same, when pushed into a corner, you just suck your thumb and chant it was legal, NSAC said so, UISADA said so, suck thumb some more... atsch

 

Interesting and informative post 👍🏼

 

I've said the same thing from the beginning dumbass. It's you who is trying to dig desperately for any minute detail to try to prove something illegal that was deemed LEGAL. And YET you want to do just the opposite with PEDvetkin (and not very well I might add...in either case really). And that's clearly because it suits your agenda. And we both know what that agenda is...as do others on here. Typical 'T@rd sh!t...

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk